These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16780026)

  • 1. Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Dziura B; Quinn S; Richard K
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 16780026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center.
    Duby JM; DiFurio MJ
    Cancer; 2009 Aug; 117(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 19536887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Liquid-based cytology--new possibilities in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
    Juric D; Mahovlić V; Rajhvajn S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Skopljanac-Macina L; Barisić A; Projić IS; Babić D; Susa M; Corusić A; Oresković S
    Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20432728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Performance of computer-assisted imaging system in detection of squamous intraepithelial lesion of uterine cervix].
    Gao YZ; Huo YL; Sun HX; Qi YF; Wang JO; Lü QJ
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 42(8):543-6. PubMed ID: 24246921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
    Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of cervical cytology screening methods and staining protocols for detection rate and accurate interpretation of ASC-H: Data from a high-volume laboratory in Turkey.
    Ozlem A; Umit I
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):863-9. PubMed ID: 26173757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the Differences between Bethesda Groups according to Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology Methods in Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Single-Center Experience with 165,915 Cases.
    Ucak R; Dilbaz OF; Polat N
    Acta Cytol; 2024; 68(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 38320537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A thin-layer, liquid-based pap test for mass screening in an area of China with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. A cross-sectional, comparative study.
    Pan Q; Belinson JL; Li L; Pretorius RG; Qiao YL; Zhang WH; Zhang X; Wu LY; Rong SD; Sun YT
    Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 12585030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
    Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
    Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL: a review of original vs. duplicate thin-layer slides.
    Quddus MR; Sung CJ; Eklund MJ; Zhang C; Steinhoff MM
    J Reprod Med; 2004 Jun; 49(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 15283054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests.
    Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
    Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 16937376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of p16(INK4A) immunocytochemistry in "Atypical squamous cells which cannot exclude HSIL" compared with "Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" in liquid-based cervical smears.
    Sung CO; Kim SR; Oh YL; Song SY
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Mar; 38(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 19760769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical implications of the diagnosis "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" in pregnant women.
    Onuma K; Saad RS; Kanbour-Shakir A; Kanbour AI; Dabbs DJ
    Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):282-7. PubMed ID: 16991139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of the ThinPrep Imaging System: clinical experience in a low risk screening population.
    Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Mar; 36(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 18232005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
    Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
    Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
    Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears.
    Negri G; Menia E; Egarter-Vigl E; Vittadello F; Mian C
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 14681941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
    Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The clinical significance of "squamous intraepithelial lesion of indeterminate grade" as a distinct cytologic category.
    Wong D; Teschendorf C; Lin GY; Hasteh F
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 May; 137(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 22523214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
    Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.