These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16780422)

  • 1. Power for detecting genetic divergence: differences between statistical methods and marker loci.
    Ryman N; Palm S; André C; Carvalho GR; Dahlgren TG; Jorde PE; Laikre L; Larsson LC; Palmé A; Ruzzante DE
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2031-45. PubMed ID: 16780422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A strategy to discover genes that carry multi-allelic or mono-allelic risk for common diseases: a cohort allelic sums test (CAST).
    Morgenthaler S; Thilly WG
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 615(1-2):28-56. PubMed ID: 17101154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing for genetic association: a powerful score test.
    El Galta R; Stijnen T; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4596-609. PubMed ID: 18551534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calculations of population differentiation based on GST and D: forget GST but not all of statistics!
    Gerlach G; Jueterbock A; Kraemer P; Deppermann J; Harmand P
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(18):3845-52. PubMed ID: 20735737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of biallelic markers and microsatellites for the estimation of population and conservation genetic parameters in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Ryynänen HJ; Tonteri A; Vasemägi A; Primmer CR
    J Hered; 2007; 98(7):692-704. PubMed ID: 17986472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exact sample sizes needed to detect dependence in 2 x 3 tables.
    Sánchez MS; Basten CJ; Ferrenberg AM; Asmussen MA; Arnold J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Mar; 69(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 16343573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative phylogeographic summary statistics for testing simultaneous vicariance.
    Hickerson MJ; Dolman G; Moritz C
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jan; 15(1):209-23. PubMed ID: 16367841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of artificial neural network analysis with other multimarker methods for detecting genetic association.
    Curtis D
    BMC Genet; 2007 Jul; 8():49. PubMed ID: 17640352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency of model-based Bayesian methods for detecting hybrid individuals under different hybridization scenarios and with different numbers of loci.
    Vähä JP; Primmer CR
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jan; 15(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 16367830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of association methods for dense marker data.
    Bacanu SA; Nelson MR; Ehm MG
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 32(8):791-9. PubMed ID: 18551558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Lancaster's mid-P correction to the Fisher's exact test for adverse impact analyses.
    Biddle DA; Morris SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):956-65. PubMed ID: 21688881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regional inference with averaged P values increases the power to detect linkage.
    Goldin LR; Chase GA; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 10446463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the utility of microsatellites for investigations of autopolyploid taxa.
    Trapnell DW; Hamrick JL; Parker KC; Braungart KW; Glenn TC
    J Hered; 2011; 102(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 21670174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeated measurement sampling in genetic association analysis with genotyping errors.
    Lai R; Zhang H; Yang Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 17187401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative performance of single nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite markers for population genetic analysis.
    Coates BS; Sumerford DV; Miller NJ; Kim KS; Sappington TW; Siegfried BD; Lewis LC
    J Hered; 2009; 100(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 19525239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concordance of allozyme and microsatellite differentiation in a marine fish, but evidence of selection at a microsatellite locus.
    Larsson LC; Laikre L; Palm S; André C; Carvalho GR; Ryman N
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Mar; 16(6):1135-47. PubMed ID: 17391402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.