These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1678060)

  • 1. Office of Scientific Integrity.
    Raub WF
    Lancet; 1991 Apr; 337(8747):980. PubMed ID: 1678060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trouble for Healy over misconduct office.
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6334):361. PubMed ID: 1650429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
    Price AR
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
    Mello MM; Brennan TA
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific misconduct. Shalala takes watchdog office out of the hunt.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1999 Oct; 286(5441):883. PubMed ID: 10577232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. OSI: better the devil you know?
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1992 Mar; 255(5050):1344-7. PubMed ID: 1311866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. At NIH, a new maelstrom over misconduct.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1991 Aug; 338(8762):301-2. PubMed ID: 1677123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On identifying research misconduct respondents.
    Parrish DM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2005 Apr; 11(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 15915856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US realigns misconduct offices at NIH.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jun; 357(6378):431. PubMed ID: 1319001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific misconduct and research integrity for the bench scientist.
    Pascal CB
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):220-30. PubMed ID: 10964256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Change in fraud review proposed.
    Culliton BJ
    Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6366):191. PubMed ID: 1313150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Office of Scientific Integrity investigations: the importance of data analysis.
    Price AA; Hallum JV
    Account Res; 1992; 2(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 16144092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recent government decision refocuses attention on several cases of alleged scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Sep; 270(11):1286. PubMed ID: 8395607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific fraud.
    Loeb MR
    FASEB J; 1991 Dec; 5(15):3117. PubMed ID: 1660423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of the office of research integrity in cancer clinical trials.
    Abbrecht P; Davidian N; Merrill S; Price AR
    Cancer Treat Res; 2007; 132():231-9. PubMed ID: 17305026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific fraud and misconduct.
    Klein DF
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1991 Dec; 11(6):337-8. PubMed ID: 1663134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity.
    Needleman HL
    Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
    Mosimann JE
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New evidence emerges in Tufts misconduct case.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1990 Sep; 347(6291):317. PubMed ID: 2170844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
    Reynolds GH
    Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.