These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Trouble for Healy over misconduct office. Aldhous P Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6334):361. PubMed ID: 1650429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity. Price AR J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Due process in investigations of research misconduct. Mello MM; Brennan TA N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct. Shalala takes watchdog office out of the hunt. Kaiser J Science; 1999 Oct; 286(5441):883. PubMed ID: 10577232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. OSI: better the devil you know? Hamilton DP Science; 1992 Mar; 255(5050):1344-7. PubMed ID: 1311866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. At NIH, a new maelstrom over misconduct. Greenberg DS Lancet; 1991 Aug; 338(8762):301-2. PubMed ID: 1677123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. On identifying research misconduct respondents. Parrish DM Sci Eng Ethics; 2005 Apr; 11(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 15915856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. US realigns misconduct offices at NIH. Anderson C Nature; 1992 Jun; 357(6378):431. PubMed ID: 1319001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific misconduct and research integrity for the bench scientist. Pascal CB Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):220-30. PubMed ID: 10964256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of the office of research integrity in cancer clinical trials. Abbrecht P; Davidian N; Merrill S; Price AR Cancer Treat Res; 2007; 132():231-9. PubMed ID: 17305026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity. Needleman HL Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases. Mosimann JE IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New evidence emerges in Tufts misconduct case. Anderson C Nature; 1990 Sep; 347(6291):317. PubMed ID: 2170844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct. Reynolds GH Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]