BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16781086)

  • 1. Value transfer across odor stimuli using probability of reinforcement in the rat.
    Kaiser DH; Means L
    Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 16781086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Superordinate category formation in pigeons: association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent.
    Astley SL; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Oct; 25(4):415-32. PubMed ID: 10531658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transfer of value from S+ to S- in simultaneous discriminations in humans.
    Lonon AM; Zentall TR
    Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 10696277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex in learning under changing task contingencies.
    Kim J; Ragozzino ME
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2005 Mar; 83(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 15721796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences between simultaneous and blocked training detected by a transfer test.
    Caetano MS; Guilhardi P; Church RM
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 17403584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Teaching hooded crows (Corvus cornix L.) the abstract rule of choice by the matching/oddity of the sample].
    Smirnova AA; Lazareva OF; Zorina ZA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1998; 48(5):855-67. PubMed ID: 9949535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transposition and its generalization in common marmosets.
    Yamazaki Y; Saiki M; Inada M; Iriki A; Watanabe S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(3):317-26. PubMed ID: 25545979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Occasion setting in Pavlovian ambiguous target discriminations.
    Bueno JL; Holland PC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Nov; 79(3):132-47. PubMed ID: 18657599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Damage to the hippocampal formation does not disrupt representational flexibility as measured by a novelty transfer test.
    Driscoll I; Sutherland RJ; Prusky GT; Rudy JW
    Behav Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 118(6):1427-32. PubMed ID: 15598151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrete-trial vs. continuous free-operant procedures in assessing whether reinforcement context affects reinforcement value.
    McDevitt MA; Bell MC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):376-83. PubMed ID: 18054442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transfer to intermediate forms following concept discrimination by pigeons: chimeras and morphs.
    Ghosh N; Lea SE; Noury M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 15540501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response patterning during stimulus generalization in the rat.
    Crites RJ; Harris RT; Rosenquist H; Thomas DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Mar; 10(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 6032521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The olfactory orientation traits of white rats in a maze].
    Stol'berg AM; Grigorian GE
    Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 1991; 27(5):686-8. PubMed ID: 1808972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Categorization of visual stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera.
    Benard J; Stach S; Giurfa M
    Anim Cogn; 2006 Oct; 9(4):257-70. PubMed ID: 16909238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Both motivational and training factors affect response conflict choice performance in rats.
    Haddon JE; Killcross S
    Neural Netw; 2006 Oct; 19(8):1192-202. PubMed ID: 16942858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of temporal generalization in a temporal discrimination task.
    Russell R; Kirkpatrick K
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 16979846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The individual characteristics of dogs with a free choice of the probability and value of food reinforcement].
    Preobrazhenskiĭ LA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1997; 47(3):487-99. PubMed ID: 9273788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do discrimination tasks discourage multi-dimensional stimulus processing? Evidence from a cross-modal object discrimination in rats.
    Jeffery KJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 183(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 17692934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vicarious trial-and-error behavior and hippocampal cytochrome oxidase activity during Y-maze discrimination learning in the rat.
    Hu D; Xu X; Gonzalez-Lima F
    Int J Neurosci; 2006 Mar; 116(3):265-80. PubMed ID: 16484053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing odor generalization in the rat: a sensitive technique.
    Duncan HJ; Beauchamp GK; Yamazaki K
    Physiol Behav; 1992 Sep; 52(3):617-20. PubMed ID: 1409930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.