120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16782192)
21. The integration of ecological risk assessment and structured decision making into watershed management.
Ohlson DW; Serveiss VB
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jan; 3(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 17283600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Decision-making factors in cases of child neglect.
Alter CF
Child Welfare; 1985; 64(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 3979162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Concordance between adolescent reports of childhood abuse and Child Protective Service determinations in an at-risk sample of young adolescents.
Everson MD; Smith JB; Hussey JM; English D; Litrownik AJ; Dubowitz H; Thompson R; Dawes Knight E; Runyan DK
Child Maltreat; 2008 Feb; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 18174345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN.
Westerhuis ME; van Horen E; Kwee A; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Moons KG
BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 19250366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Children with disabilities in the child protective services system: an analog study of investigation and case management.
Manders JE; Stoneman Z
Child Abuse Negl; 2009 Apr; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 19348941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors influencing laboratory workers' decisions to accept or decline anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA): results of a decision-making study in CDC's anthrax vaccination program.
Fowler GL; Baggs JM; Weintraub ES; Martin SW; McNeil MM; Gust DA
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2006 Dec; 15(12):880-8. PubMed ID: 16924600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differentiating between substantiated, suspected, and unsubstantiated maltreatment in Canada.
Trocmé N; Knoke D; Fallon B; MacLaurin B
Child Maltreat; 2009 Feb; 14(1):4-16. PubMed ID: 18710956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Rhode Island's child protective service system.
Fandetti KM; Ohsberg LA
Child Welfare; 1987; 66(6):529-38. PubMed ID: 3677856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinicians' description of factors influencing their reporting of suspected child abuse: report of the Child Abuse Reporting Experience Study Research Group.
Jones R; Flaherty EG; Binns HJ; Price LL; Slora E; Abney D; Harris DL; Christoffel KK; Sege RD;
Pediatrics; 2008 Aug; 122(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 18676541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of Family Connections.
DePanfilis D; Dubowitz H; Kunz J
Child Abuse Negl; 2008 Mar; 32(3):335-51. PubMed ID: 18377989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality of care in sepsis management: development and testing of measures for improvement.
Marwick C; Watts E; Evans J; Davey P
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2007 Sep; 60(3):694-7. PubMed ID: 17595286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk assessment as a practice method in child protective services.
English DJ; Pecora PJ
Child Welfare; 1994; 73(5):451-73. PubMed ID: 7924563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Inter-rater reliability in disability assessment based on a semi-structured interview report.
Spanjer J; Krol B; Brouwer S; Groothoff JW
Disabil Rehabil; 2008; 30(24):1885-90. PubMed ID: 19037781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Re-referral to child protective services: the influence of child, family, and case characteristics on risk status.
Connell CM; Bergeron N; Katz KH; Saunders L; Tebes JK
Child Abuse Negl; 2007 May; 31(5):573-88. PubMed ID: 17537504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development of an instrument to understand the child protective services decision-making process, with a focus on placement decisions.
Dettlaff AJ; Christopher Graham J; Holzman J; Baumann DJ; Fluke JD
Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Nov; 49():24-34. PubMed ID: 25913382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Audit and feedback using the brief Decision Support Analysis Tool (DSAT-10) to evaluate nurse-standardized patient encounters.
Stacey D; Taljaard M; Drake ER; O'Connor AM
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 18722074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Decisions regarding the order of opening multiple high-risk cases: a pilot study in an urban hospital.
Holden G; Cuzzi LF; Grob GG; Bazer C
Soc Work Health Care; 1995; 22(1):37-55. PubMed ID: 8693397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of parental intellectual disability status on child protection service worker decision making.
Proctor SN; Azar ST
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2013 Dec; 57(12):1104-16. PubMed ID: 22998373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]