These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16782285)

  • 1. The role of place of reinforcer delivery in the appearance of positive induction when rats respond for 1% sucrose.
    Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Kristiansen-Moen LA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 16782285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Duration, response, and location: the influence of upcoming 32% sucrose on rats' licking or lever pressing for 1% liquid sucrose.
    Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Arthur EI; King BM
    Behav Processes; 2005 Aug; 70(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 15939550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Altering "motivational" variables alters induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement.
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Tischart LM
    Anim Cogn; 2003 Mar; 6(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 12658532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of upcoming food-pellet delivery on subjects' responding for 1% sucrose reinforcement delivered by concurrent random-interval schedules.
    Weatherly JN; Grove C; Beste R
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 17503690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Induction when rats lick for 1% liquid-sucrose reinforcement.
    Weatherly JN; Lang KK; King BM; Beste R; Grove C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):654-66. PubMed ID: 16707355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating retrospective influences on induction in rats' responding for 1% sucrose when food-pellet reinforcement is upcoming.
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 16475670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating the procedural variables that determine whether rats will display negative anticipatory contrast or positive induction.
    Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Hanson BC
    Behav Processes; 2005 Aug; 70(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 15913919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement the outcome of an increase in overall activity or in operant responding?
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Nurnberger JT
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 16475671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of ethanol reinforcement in 1-day-old rats: assessment through a brief and novel operant procedure.
    Bordner KA; Molina JC; Spear NE
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2008 Apr; 32(4):580-92. PubMed ID: 18366451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus change dis-habituates operant responding supported by water reinforcers.
    McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES; Wiediger RS
    Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 16112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the determinants of induction in responding for sucrose when food pellet reinforcement is upcoming.
    Weatherly JN; Plumm KM; Smith JR; Roberts WA
    Anim Learn Behav; 2002 Nov; 30(4):315-29. PubMed ID: 12593324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effect of body weight manipulation.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2004 Feb; 65(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15222966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Within-session rates of responding when reinforcer magnitude is changed within the session.
    Weatherly JN; McSweeney FK; Swindell S
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 14977028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential changes in sucrose/ethanol and sucrose maintained responding by independently altering ethanol or sucrose concentration.
    Slawecki CJ; Samson HH; Hodge CW
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1997 Apr; 21(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 9113261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of prefeeding on fixed-ratio pausing is jointly determined by past and upcoming reinforcer magnitudes.
    Galuska CM; Yadon KA
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 20804830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Independent ethanol- and sucrose-maintained responding on a multiple schedule of reinforcement.
    Czachowski CL; Samson HH; Denning CE
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1999 Mar; 23(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 10195809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Up or down: the influence of upcoming reinforcement on consummatory and operant behavior.
    King BM; Brandt AE; Weatherly JN
    J Gen Psychol; 2002 Oct; 129(4):443-61. PubMed ID: 12494994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethanol-reinforced responding by AA and ANA rats following the sucrose-substitution initiation procedure.
    Files FJ; Denning CE; Hyytia P; Kiianmaa K; Samson HH
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1997 Jun; 21(4):749-53. PubMed ID: 9194935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effect of pre-running.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jan; 71(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16165314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus control over induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement.
    Weatherly JN; Tischart LM; Palbicki J
    Behav Processes; 2003 Aug; 64(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 12915001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.