These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16782340)

  • 1. Capturing cellular machines by systematic screens of protein complexes.
    Gagneur J; David L; Steinmetz LM
    Trends Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 14(8):336-9. PubMed ID: 16782340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative assessment of the structural bias in protein-protein interaction assays.
    Björklund AK; Light S; Hedin L; Elofsson A
    Proteomics; 2008 Nov; 8(22):4657-67. PubMed ID: 18924110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting protein-protein interactions from sequence using correlation coefficient and high-quality interaction dataset.
    Shi MG; Xia JF; Li XL; Huang DS
    Amino Acids; 2010 Mar; 38(3):891-9. PubMed ID: 19387790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Playing tag with the yeast proteome.
    Andrews BJ; Bader GD; Boone C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1297-9. PubMed ID: 14595360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the dynamics of the yeast proteome by means of 2-DE.
    Massoni A; Moes S; Perrot M; Jenoe P; Boucherie H
    Proteomics; 2009 Oct; 9(20):4674-85. PubMed ID: 19795422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the yeast proteome: a bioinformatics perspective.
    Grigoriev A
    Expert Rev Proteomics; 2004 Aug; 1(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 15966814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality.
    Hart GT; Lee I; Marcotte ER
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 8():236. PubMed ID: 17605818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward the complete yeast mitochondrial proteome: multidimensional separation techniques for mitochondrial proteomics.
    Reinders J; Zahedi RP; Pfanner N; Meisinger C; Sickmann A
    J Proteome Res; 2006 Jul; 5(7):1543-54. PubMed ID: 16823961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery.
    Gavin AC; Aloy P; Grandi P; Krause R; Boesche M; Marzioch M; Rau C; Jensen LJ; Bastuck S; Dümpelfeld B; Edelmann A; Heurtier MA; Hoffman V; Hoefert C; Klein K; Hudak M; Michon AM; Schelder M; Schirle M; Remor M; Rudi T; Hooper S; Bauer A; Bouwmeester T; Casari G; Drewes G; Neubauer G; Rick JM; Kuster B; Bork P; Russell RB; Superti-Furga G
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7084):631-6. PubMed ID: 16429126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Cartographers toolbox: building bigger and better human protein interaction networks.
    Sanderson CM
    Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic; 2009 Jan; 8(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19282470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying functional modules in the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Pu S; Vlasblom J; Emili A; Greenblatt J; Wodak SJ
    Proteomics; 2007 Mar; 7(6):944-60. PubMed ID: 17370254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The mitochondrial proteome database: MitoP2.
    Elstner M; Andreoli C; Klopstock T; Meitinger T; Prokisch H
    Methods Enzymol; 2009; 457():3-20. PubMed ID: 19426859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. I-DIRT, a general method for distinguishing between specific and nonspecific protein interactions.
    Tackett AJ; DeGrasse JA; Sekedat MD; Oeffinger M; Rout MP; Chait BT
    J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(5):1752-6. PubMed ID: 16212429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genome-wide system analysis reveals stable yet flexible network dynamics in yeast.
    Gustafsson M; Hörnquist M; Björkegren J; Tegnér J
    IET Syst Biol; 2009 Jul; 3(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 19640161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise.
    Newman JR; Ghaemmaghami S; Ihmels J; Breslow DK; Noble M; DeRisi JL; Weissman JS
    Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7095):840-6. PubMed ID: 16699522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proteomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Pham TK; Wright PC
    Expert Rev Proteomics; 2007 Dec; 4(6):793-813. PubMed ID: 18067417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting functional modules in the yeast protein-protein interaction network.
    Chen J; Yuan B
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2283-90. PubMed ID: 16837529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interactive proteomics research technologies: recent applications and advances.
    Petschnigg J; Snider J; Stagljar I
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2011 Feb; 22(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20884196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approaches for systematic proteome exploration.
    Falk R; Ramström M; Ståhl S; Hober S
    Biomol Eng; 2007 Jun; 24(2):155-68. PubMed ID: 17376740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification and characterization of protein subcomplexes in yeast.
    Hollunder J; Beyer A; Wilhelm T
    Proteomics; 2005 May; 5(8):2082-9. PubMed ID: 15832363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.