These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Single-center outcome analysis of 1,161 patients with St. Jude medical and ATS open pivot mechanical heart valves. Bernet FH; Baykut D; Grize L; Zerkowski HR J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Mar; 16(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 17484464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Valve replacement surgery in end-stage renal failure: mechanical prostheses versus bioprostheses. Chan V; Jamieson WR; Fleisher AG; Denmark D; Chan F; Germann E Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Mar; 81(3):857-62. PubMed ID: 16488684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population. Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis in the mitral position: a 10-year follow up of St. Jude Medical and Biocor valves. Demirag M; Kirali K; Omeroglu SN; Mansuroglu D; Akinci E; Ipek G; Berki T; Gürbüz A; Isik O; Yakut C J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11206772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term and intermediate-term outcomes of aortic root replacement with St. Jude mechanical conduits and aortic allografts. Lima B; Hughes GC; Lemaire A; Jaggers J; Glower DD; Wolfe WG Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Aug; 82(2):579-85; discussion 585. PubMed ID: 16863768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years. Stassano P; Di Tommaso L; Monaco M; Iorio F; Pepino P; Spampinato N; Vosa C J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(20):1862-8. PubMed ID: 19892237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]