These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16784162)

  • 1. Closed-loop recycling of construction and demolition waste in Germany in view of stricter environmental threshold values.
    Weil M; Jeske U; Schebek L
    Waste Manag Res; 2006 Jun; 24(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 16784162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of recycled concrete aggregates for their suitability in construction activities: An experimental study.
    Puthussery JV; Kumar R; Garg A
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():270-276. PubMed ID: 27353393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete.
    Marinković S; Radonjanin V; Malešev M; Ignjatović I
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2255-64. PubMed ID: 20434898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A bi-level environmental impact assessment framework for comparing construction and demolition waste management strategies.
    Yazdanbakhsh A
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jul; 77():401-412. PubMed ID: 29709308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation analysis between sulphate content and leaching of sulphates in recycled aggregates from construction and demolition wastes.
    Barbudo A; Galvín AP; Agrela F; Ayuso J; Jiménez JR
    Waste Manag; 2012 Jun; 32(6):1229-35. PubMed ID: 22410435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systems analysis tool for construction and demolition wastes management.
    Wang JY; Touran A; Christoforou C; Fadlalla H
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(10):989-97. PubMed ID: 15567664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Separability studies of construction and demolition waste recycled sand.
    Ulsen C; Kahn H; Hawlitschek G; Masini EA; Angulo SC
    Waste Manag; 2013 Mar; 33(3):656-62. PubMed ID: 22835506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Life cycle assessment of the end-of-life phase of a residential building.
    Vitale P; Arena N; Di Gregorio F; Arena U
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():311-321. PubMed ID: 27742229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis.
    Roussat N; Dujet C; Méhu J
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 18572397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sustainable management and supply of natural and recycled aggregates in a medium-size integrated plant.
    Faleschini F; Zanini MA; Pellegrino C; Pasinato S
    Waste Manag; 2016 Mar; 49():146-155. PubMed ID: 26810029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Construction and demolition waste as recycled aggregate for environmentally friendly concrete paving.
    Contreras Llanes M; Romero Pérez M; Gázquez González MJ; Bolívar Raya JP
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(7):9826-9840. PubMed ID: 34505964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of inert wastes in the construction, operation and closure of landfills: Calculation tool.
    Colomer Mendoza FJ; Esteban Altabella J; Gallardo Izquierdo A
    Waste Manag; 2017 Jan; 59():276-285. PubMed ID: 27816471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimised design of concrete recycling networks: The case of North Rhine-Westphalia.
    Tsydenova N; Becker T; Walther G
    Waste Manag; 2021 Nov; 135():309-317. PubMed ID: 34563878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Closed cycle construction: an integrated process for the separation and reuse of C&D waste.
    Mulder E; de Jong TP; Feenstra L
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(10):1408-15. PubMed ID: 17532617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Construction demolition wastes, Waelz slag and MSWI bottom ash: a comparative technical analysis as material for road construction.
    Vegas I; Ibañez JA; San José JT; Urzelai A
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 17451930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Framework for economic assessment of concrete waste management strategies.
    El-Shaboury N; Abdelhamid M; Marzouk M
    Waste Manag Res; 2019 Mar; 37(3):268-277. PubMed ID: 30541406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indicators to assess the recovery of natural resources contained in demolition waste.
    Roussat N; Méhu J; Dujet C
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Mar; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 19244415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making.
    Di Maria A; Eyckmans J; Van Acker K
    Waste Manag; 2018 May; 75():3-21. PubMed ID: 29398268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Life cycle assessment of disposal of residues from municipal solid waste incineration: recycling of bottom ash in road construction or landfilling in Denmark evaluated in the ROAD-RES model.
    Birgisdóttir H; Bhander G; Hauschild MZ; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):S75-84. PubMed ID: 17416511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental and Economic Life Cycle Assessment of Recycled Coarse Aggregates: A Portuguese Case Study.
    Dias AB; Pacheco JN; Silvestre JD; Martins IM; de Brito J
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Sep; 14(18):. PubMed ID: 34576678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.