BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16785212)

  • 1. Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative.
    Anisimova M; Gascuel O
    Syst Biol; 2006 Aug; 55(4):539-52. PubMed ID: 16785212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calculating the evolutionary rates of different genes: a fast, accurate estimator with applications to maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis.
    Bevan RB; Lang BF; Bryant D
    Syst Biol; 2005 Dec; 54(6):900-15. PubMed ID: 16282169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survey of branch support methods demonstrates accuracy, power, and robustness of fast likelihood-based approximation schemes.
    Anisimova M; Gil M; Dufayard JF; Dessimoz C; Gascuel O
    Syst Biol; 2011 Oct; 60(5):685-99. PubMed ID: 21540409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When being "most likely" is not enough: examining the performance of three uses of the parametric bootstrap in phylogenetics.
    Antezana M
    J Mol Evol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 12574867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny.
    Yang Z; Rannala B
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 16012111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?
    Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
    Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weighted least-squares likelihood ratio test for branch testing in phylogenies reconstructed from distance measures.
    Sanjuán R; Wróbel B
    Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):218-29. PubMed ID: 16012093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fundamental differences between the methods of maximum likelihood and maximum posterior probability in phylogenetics.
    Svennblad B; Erixon P; Oxelman B; Britton T
    Syst Biol; 2006 Feb; 55(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 16507528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Least and most powerful phylogenetic tests to elucidate the origin of the seed plants in the presence of conflicting signals under misspecified models.
    Aris-Brosou S
    Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):781-93. PubMed ID: 14668117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increasing the efficiency of searches for the maximum likelihood tree in a phylogenetic analysis of up to 150 nucleotide sequences.
    Morrison DA
    Syst Biol; 2007 Dec; 56(6):988-1010. PubMed ID: 18066931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of branch length uncertainty on Bayesian posterior probabilities for phylogenetic hypotheses.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Sep; 24(9):2108-18. PubMed ID: 17636043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):980-4. PubMed ID: 15496922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SuperTRI: A new approach based on branch support analyses of multiple independent data sets for assessing reliability of phylogenetic inferences.
    Ropiquet A; Li B; Hassanin A
    C R Biol; 2009 Sep; 332(9):832-47. PubMed ID: 19748458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0.
    Guindon S; Dufayard JF; Lefort V; Anisimova M; Hordijk W; Gascuel O
    Syst Biol; 2010 May; 59(3):307-21. PubMed ID: 20525638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics.
    Brinkmann H; van der Giezen M; Zhou Y; Poncelin de Raucourt G; Philippe H
    Syst Biol; 2005 Oct; 54(5):743-57. PubMed ID: 16243762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging.
    Posada D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Jul; 25(7):1253-6. PubMed ID: 18397919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The metapopulation genetic algorithm: An efficient solution for the problem of large phylogeny estimation.
    Lemmon AR; Milinkovitch MC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Aug; 99(16):10516-21. PubMed ID: 12142465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the distributions of bootstrap support and posterior distributions for a star tree.
    Susko E
    Syst Biol; 2008 Aug; 57(4):602-12. PubMed ID: 18709598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of branch length variation on the selection of models of molecular evolution.
    Posada D
    J Mol Evol; 2001 May; 52(5):434-44. PubMed ID: 11443347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 71.