These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. A vision for the European journal of clinical investigation: note from the new editors. Ioannidis JP; Tatsioni A; Karassa FB Eur J Clin Invest; 2010 Jan; 40(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20055893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Reviewing for journals: ask not what your profession can do for you but what you can do for your profession. Steers WD J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1597. PubMed ID: 16600708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [The good debate]. Becker F; Erlenkamp S Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Jun; 128(13):1546; discussion 1546-7. PubMed ID: 18587470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Responsibilities of the editor. Punjabi PP Perfusion; 2010 May; 25(3):113-4. PubMed ID: 20581024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Response to supplements to medical journals: adding knowledge or subtracting from the public trust? Fields D J Am Geriatr Soc; 2006 Aug; 54(8):1296; author reply 1296-7. PubMed ID: 16914006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Supplements to medical journals: adding knowledge or subtracting from the public trust? Yoshikawa TT; Ouslander JG J Am Geriatr Soc; 2006 Jan; 54(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16420191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Perceived journal quality: an indicator of research quality. Fahy K; Fenwick J Women Birth; 2008 Sep; 21(3):97-8. PubMed ID: 18657498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers. Malay DS J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Consider the source. Mason DJ Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Criticism without inhibitions]. Aavitsland P Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Jun; 128(12):1377. PubMed ID: 18552894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection]. Clarke SP Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Scientific reporting guidelines]. Nylenna M Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The ATS Journals' policy on image manipulation. Abraham E; Adler KB; Shapiro SD; Leff AR Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol; 2008 Nov; 39(5):499. PubMed ID: 18927351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [A year with New England Journal of Medicine]. Bretthauer M Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Oct; 129(19):1971. PubMed ID: 19823197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. On editorial practice and peer review. Shahar E J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 17683318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals. Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [When the editor makes an error]. Hem E Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Oct; 128(20):2303. PubMed ID: 19096482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]