These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16786352)

  • 21. Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage.
    Keus IM; Jenks KM; Schwarz W
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15922157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect.
    Gevers W; Verguts T; Reynvoet B; Caessens B; Fias W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 16478324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multisession, dual-task psychological refractory period practice benefits older and younger adults equally.
    Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Elicker JD; Lien MC
    Exp Aging Res; 2009 Oct; 35(4):369-99. PubMed ID: 20183098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of temporal unpredictability for process interference and code overlap in perception-action dual tasks.
    Koch I; Metin B; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 12684780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using Key Distance to Clarify a Theory on the SNARC.
    Schiller F; Eloka O; Franz VH
    Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):196-221. PubMed ID: 26822868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: the SNARC effect revisited.
    Fitousi D; Shaki S; Algom D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):143-55. PubMed ID: 19304604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. There is more than "more is up": Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes.
    Hartmann M; Gashaj V; Stahnke A; Mast FW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1401-14. PubMed ID: 24749934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development of spatial representation of numbers: a study of the SNARC effect in Chinese children.
    Yang T; Chen C; Zhou X; Xu J; Dong Q; Chen C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Jan; 117():1-11. PubMed ID: 24121228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A PRP-study to determine the locus of target priming effects.
    Klapötke S; Krüger D; Mattler U
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):882-900. PubMed ID: 21570320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. SNARC effects with numerical and non-numerical symbolic comparative judgments: instructional and cultural dependencies.
    Shaki S; Petrusic WM; Leth-Steensen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):515-30. PubMed ID: 22288694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modularity beyond perception: evidence from the PRP paradigm.
    Magen H; Cohen A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):395-414. PubMed ID: 20364926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. SNARC struggles: Instant control over spatial-numerical associations.
    Pfister R; Schroeder PA; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1953-8. PubMed ID: 23647378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing implicit and synaesthetic number-space associations: Visuospatial and verbal spatial-numerical associations of response codes.
    Jonas CN; Spiller MJ; Jansari A; Ward J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1262-73. PubMed ID: 24228728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
    Roettger TB; Domahs F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Processing stage flexibility of the SNARC effect: Task relevance or magnitude relevance?
    Xiang X; Yan L; Fu S; Nan W
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1022999. PubMed ID: 36438366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Processing two tasks with varying task order: central stage duration influences central processing order.
    Ruiz Fernández S; Leonhard T; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 21427007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Separate mechanisms for magnitude and order processing in the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect: The strange case of musical note values.
    Prpic V; Fumarola A; De Tommaso M; Luccio R; Murgia M; Agostini T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1241-51. PubMed ID: 26950384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes.
    Lee D; Chun J; Cho S
    Perception; 2016 May; 45(5):552-67. PubMed ID: 27151510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect?
    Van Selst M; Ruthruff E; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Oct; 25(5):1268-83. PubMed ID: 10531663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.