These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16786352)

  • 41. Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect.
    Gevers W; Lammertyn J; Notebaert W; Verguts T; Fias W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 16423320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses.
    Schwarz W; Keus IM
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 May; 66(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 15311664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The universal SNARC effect: the association between number magnitude and space is amodal.
    Nuerk HC; Wood G; Willmes K
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 16076066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S; Finkelshtein A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1791-802. PubMed ID: 20952778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. SNARC meets SPARC in fMRI--Interdependence of compatibility effects depends on semantic content.
    Weis T; Estner B; Krick CM; Reith W; Lachmann T
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():331-8. PubMed ID: 26382748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. SNARC Effect in Different Effectors.
    Hesse PN; Fiehler K; Bremmer F
    Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):180-95. PubMed ID: 26562877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The psychological refractory period in Parkinson's disease.
    Hsieh S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):893-902. PubMed ID: 11153866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Two orienting mechanisms in posterior parietal lobule: an rTMS study of the Simon and SNARC effects.
    Rusconi E; Turatto M; Umiltà C
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 Jun; 24(4):373-92. PubMed ID: 18416497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A neuropsychological assessment of dual-task costs in closed-head injury patients using Cohen's effect size estimation method.
    Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P; Pashler H
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 16142490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: declining automaticity with advancing age.
    Maquestiaux F; Laguë-Beauvais M; Ruthruff E; Hartley A; Bherer L
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Mar; 25(1):177-92. PubMed ID: 20230138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.
    Franz EA; Sebastian A; Hust C; Norris T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 18377178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Repetition and the SNARC effect with one- and two-digit numbers.
    Tan S; Dixon P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):84-97. PubMed ID: 21668090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The SNARC effect occurs in the response-selection stage.
    Yan L; Yang G; Nan W; Liu X; Fu S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Apr; 215():103292. PubMed ID: 33740617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.
    Besner D; Reynolds M; O'Malley S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2222-34. PubMed ID: 19370482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Attention allows the SNARC effect to operate on multiple number lines.
    Weis T; Nuerk HC; Lachmann T
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13778. PubMed ID: 30214027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Rotondaro F; Doricchi F
    Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():298-316. PubMed ID: 26520681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck.
    Hazeltine E; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 16151721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.
    Miller J
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):484-93. PubMed ID: 16237555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Schumacher EH; Schwarb H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Is the SNARC effect related to the level of mathematics? No systematic relationship observed despite more power, more repetitions, and more direct assessment of arithmetic skill.
    Cipora K; Nuerk HC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):1974-91. PubMed ID: 23473520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.