216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16786395)
1. Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Vande Geest JP; Wang DH; Wisniewski SR; Makaroun MS; Vorp DA
Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 34(7):1098-106. PubMed ID: 16786395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model.
Rissland P; Alemu Y; Einav S; Ricotta J; Bluestein D
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):031001. PubMed ID: 19154060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment: demonstrative application.
Vande Geest JP; Di Martino ES; Bohra A; Makaroun MS; Vorp DA
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Nov; 1085():11-21. PubMed ID: 17182918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of age on the elastic properties of the intraluminal thrombus and the thrombus-covered wall in abdominal aortic aneurysms: biaxial extension behaviour and material modelling.
Tong J; Cohnert T; Regitnig P; Holzapfel GA
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2011 Aug; 42(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 21440466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution.
Martufi G; Di Martino ES; Amon CH; Muluk SC; Finol EA
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jun; 131(6):061015. PubMed ID: 19449969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Speelman L; Bohra A; Bosboom EM; Schurink GW; van de Vosse FN; Makaorun MS; Vorp DA
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 17227104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward a model for local drug delivery in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Vande Geest JP; Simon BR; Mortazavi A
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Nov; 1085():396-9. PubMed ID: 17182962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Papaharilaou Y; Ekaterinaris JA; Manousaki E; Katsamouris AN
J Biomech; 2007; 40(2):367-77. PubMed ID: 16500664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue.
Di Martino ES; Bohra A; Vande Geest JP; Gupta N; Makaroun MS; Vorp DA
J Vasc Surg; 2006 Mar; 43(3):570-6; discussion 576. PubMed ID: 16520175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Wolters BJ; Rutten MC; Schurink GW; Kose U; de Hart J; van de Vosse FN
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Dec; 27(10):871-83. PubMed ID: 16157501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The quasi-static failure properties of the abdominal aortic aneurysm wall estimated by a mixed experimental-numerical approach.
Forsell C; Swedenborg J; Roy J; Gasser TC
Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Jul; 41(7):1554-66. PubMed ID: 23263935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Raghavan ML; Kratzberg J; Castro de Tolosa EM; Hanaoka MM; Walker P; da Silva ES
J Biomech; 2006; 39(16):3010-6. PubMed ID: 16337949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Importance of initial stress for abdominal aortic aneurysm wall motion: dynamic MRI validated finite element analysis.
Merkx MA; van 't Veer M; Speelman L; Breeuwer M; Buth J; van de Vosse FN
J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2369-73. PubMed ID: 19665127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring and modeling patient-specific distributions of material properties in abdominal aortic aneurysm wall.
Reeps C; Maier A; Pelisek J; Härtl F; Grabher-Meier V; Wall WA; Essler M; Eckstein HH; Gee MW
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2013 Aug; 12(4):717-33. PubMed ID: 22955570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histologic, histochemical, and biomechanical properties of fragments isolated from the anterior wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Tavares Monteiro JA; da Silva ES; Raghavan ML; Puech-Leão P; de Lourdes Higuchi M; Otoch JP
J Vasc Surg; 2014 May; 59(5):1393-401.e1-2. PubMed ID: 23891493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Porohyperelastic finite element modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Ayyalasomayajula A; Vande Geest JP; Simon BR
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Oct; 132(10):104502. PubMed ID: 20887020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computational evaluation of aortic aneurysm rupture risk: what have we learned so far?
Georgakarakos E; Ioannou CV; Papaharilaou Y; Kostas T; Katsamouris AN
J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Apr; 18(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 21521062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraluminal thrombus and risk of rupture in patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysm - FSI modelling.
Bluestein D; Dumont K; De Beule M; Ricotta J; Impellizzeri P; Verhegghe B; Verdonck P
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Feb; 12(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18651282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The role of computational mechanics].
Giannoglou G; Giannakoulas G; Hatzitolios AI; Rudolf J
Herz; 2008 Jul; 33(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 18773155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy.
Rodríguez JF; Ruiz C; Doblaré M; Holzapfel GA
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021023. PubMed ID: 18412510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
