These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16786405)

  • 21. Juror stress.
    Hafemeister TL
    Violence Vict; 1993; 8(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 8193058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of graphic photographic evidence on mock jurors' decisions in a murder trial: probative or prejudicial?
    Douglas KS; Lyon DR; Ogloff JR
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Oct; 21(5):485-501. PubMed ID: 9374603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law.
    Salerno JM; Bottoms BL
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(2):273-96. PubMed ID: 19319835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of defendant sexual orientation on jurors' perceptions of child sexual assault.
    Wiley TR; Bottoms BL
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 18404363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. When emotionality trumps reason: a study of individual processing style and juror bias.
    Gunnell JJ; Ceci SJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):850-77. PubMed ID: 20583074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. N.C. Supreme Court upholds exclusion of HIV in jury selection.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1995 Sep; 10(16):3-4. PubMed ID: 11362769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of race on jurors' perceptions of lethal police use of force.
    Ewanation L; Maeder EM
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 36931849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A third verdict option: exploring the impact of the not proven verdict on mock juror decision making.
    Hope L; Greene E; Memon A; Gavisk M; Houston K
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 17703354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence.
    London K; Nunez N
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Dec; 85(6):932-9. PubMed ID: 11125657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM; Seib HM
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 15161410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Determinants of juror decision making: an example for using time series analysis in legal psychology].
    Kette G
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1990; 142(1):59-80. PubMed ID: 2288489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How reason for surgery and patient weight affect verdicts and perceptions in medical malpractice trials: a comparison of students and jurors.
    Reichert J; Miller MK; Bornstein BH; Shelton HD
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):395-418. PubMed ID: 21308752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An analysis of the effects of subjective and objective instruction forms on mock-juries' murder/manslaughter distinctions.
    Spackman MP; Belcher JC; Calapp JW; Taylor A
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Dec; 26(6):605-23. PubMed ID: 12508697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of religion in death penalty sentencing trials.
    Miller MK; Bornstein BH
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 17051441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gender biases in decisions on euthanasia among Swedish jurors.
    Sjöberg RL; Lindholm T
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2003; 57(6):469-71. PubMed ID: 14630553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making.
    Cooper A; Quas JA; Cleveland KC
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):813-28. PubMed ID: 25537438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Expert testimony pertaining to battered woman syndrome: its impact on jurors' decisions.
    Schuller RA; Rzepa S
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Dec; 26(6):655-73. PubMed ID: 12508700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Science in the jury box: jurors' comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence.
    Hans VP; Kaye DH; Dann BM; Farley EJ; Albertson S
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 20461543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of neuroimaging evidence on mock juror decision making.
    Greene E; Cahill BS
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):280-96. PubMed ID: 22213023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Commentary: Perception of remorse by mock jurors in a capital murder trial.
    Batista LM; Myers W
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22396342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.