These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16786408)

  • 1. Credibility of the emotional witness: a study of ratings by court judges.
    Wessel E; Drevland GC; Eilertsen DE; Magnussen S
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 16786408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expert witness confidence and juror personality: their impact on credibility and persuasion in the courtroom.
    Cramer RJ; Brodsky SL; DeCoster J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19297636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A meta-analysis of the emotional victim effect for female adult rape complainants: Does complainant distress influence credibility?
    Nitschke FT; McKimmie BM; Vanman EJ
    Psychol Bull; 2019 Oct; 145(10):953-979. PubMed ID: 31282696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Appropriately upset? Emotion norms and perceptions of crime victims.
    Rose MR; Nadler J; Clark J
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):203-19. PubMed ID: 16786407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of type of out-of-court disclosure in a child sexual assault trial.
    Yozwiak JA; Golding JM; Marsil DF
    Child Maltreat; 2004 Aug; 9(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 15245684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why emotions matter: expectancy violation and affective response mediate the emotional victim effect.
    Ask K; Landström S
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 20107882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.
    Goodman GS; Myers JE; Qin J; Quas JA; Castelli P; Redlich AD; Rogers L
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):363-401. PubMed ID: 16779675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Emotional Child Witness Effect Survives Presentation Mode.
    Melinder A; Burrell L; Eriksen MO; Magnussen S; Wessel E
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):113-25. PubMed ID: 26990221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making.
    Cooper A; Quas JA; Cleveland KC
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):813-28. PubMed ID: 25537438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceived credibility and eyewitness testimony of children with intellectual disabilities.
    Henry L; Ridley A; Perry J; Crane L
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2011 Apr; 55(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 21265903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Expert witness in cases of rape].
    Bang L
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Jun; 112(15):1967-70. PubMed ID: 1509461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of overt rehearsal in enhanced conscious memory for emotional events.
    Guy SC; Cahill L
    Conscious Cogn; 1999 Mar; 8(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 10072696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial.
    Riedel RG
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):819-32. PubMed ID: 8302986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments.
    Semmler C; Brewer N
    Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(4):423-36. PubMed ID: 12210977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The emotional male victim: effects of presentation mode on judged credibility.
    Landström S; Ask K; Sommar C
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Feb; 56(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 25356749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Judgment of the credibility of rape allegations: a content analytic field experiment].
    Krahé B; Kundrotas S
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(4):598-620. PubMed ID: 1295273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gruesome evidence and emotion: anger, blame, and jury decision-making.
    Bright DA; Goodman-Delahunty J
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):183-202. PubMed ID: 16786406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thin slice expert testimony and mock trial deliberations.
    Parrott CT; Brodsky SL; Wilson JK
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():67-74. PubMed ID: 26346686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The court of public opinion: lay perceptions of polygraph testing.
    Myers B; Latter R; Abdollahi-Arena MK
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):509-23. PubMed ID: 16718577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distinguishing motive through perception of emotions.
    Jones RG; Chomiak M; Rittman A; Green T
    Psicothema; 2006; 18 Suppl():67-71. PubMed ID: 17295960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.