These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16786881)

  • 1. When more is less: extending training of the blocking association following compound training attenuates the blocking effect.
    Pineño O; Urushihara K; Stout S; Fuss J; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2006 Feb; 34(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 16786881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.
    Stout SC; Chang R; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 12561131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spontaneous recovery from forward and backward blocking.
    Pineño O; Urushihara K; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Apr; 31(2):172-83. PubMed ID: 15839774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An examination of changes in behavioral control when stimuli with different associative histories are conditioned in compound.
    Fam J; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(3):205-218. PubMed ID: 28481560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cues trained apart compete for behavioral control in rats: convergence with the associative interference literature.
    Escobar M; Matute H; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Mar; 130(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11293462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The fate of redundant cues: Further analysis of the redundancy effect.
    Jones PM; Pearce JM
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 25537840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overshadowing as a function of trial number: dynamics of first- and second-order comparator effects.
    Stout S; Arcediano F; Escobar M; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2003 Feb; 31(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 18450071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: support for the comparator hypothesis.
    Blaisdell AP; Bristol AS; Gunther LM; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1998 Jul; 24(3):335-51. PubMed ID: 9679309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recency-to-primacy shift in cue competition.
    Lipatova O; Wheeler DS; Vadillo MA; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Oct; 32(4):396-406. PubMed ID: 17044742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaction between preexposure and overshadowing: further analysis of the extended comparator hypothesis.
    Savastano HI; Arcediano F; Stout SC; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Nov; 56(4):371-95. PubMed ID: 14578081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The basic laws of conditioning differ for elemental cues and cues trained in compound.
    Urushihara K; Stout SC; Miller RR
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Apr; 15(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 15043646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conditioned inhibition produced by extinction-mediated recovery from the relative stimulus validity effect: a test of acquisition and performance models of empirical retrospective revaluation.
    Blaisdell AP; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jan; 27(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 11199514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparator view of Pavlovian and differential inhibition.
    Urcelay GP; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):271-83. PubMed ID: 16834494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanisms underlying retarded emergence of conditioned responding following inhibitory training: evidence for the comparator hypothesis.
    Schachtman TR; Brown AM; Gordon EL; Catterson DA; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Jul; 13(3):310-22. PubMed ID: 3612027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recovery from blocking between outcomes.
    Wheeler DS; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 16248732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing excitatory backward and forward conditioning.
    Chang RC; Stout S; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 14690847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blocking is not 'pure' cue competition: Renewal-like effects in forward and backward blocking indicate contributions by associative cue interference.
    Miguez G; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Apr; 48(2):145-159. PubMed ID: 35225640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Backward blocking in first-order conditioning.
    Urushihara K; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):281-95. PubMed ID: 20384407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrasting reduced overshadowing and blocking.
    Wheeler DS; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jul; 33(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 17620032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of subadditive pretraining on blocking: limits on generalization.
    Wheeler DS; Beckers T; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2008 Nov; 36(4):341-51. PubMed ID: 18927057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.