These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16786885)

  • 1. Concurrent schedules of wheel-running reinforcement: choice between different durations of opportunity to run in rats.
    Belke TW
    Learn Behav; 2006 Feb; 34(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 16786885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rats do not respond differently in the presence of stimuli signaling wheel-running reinforcers of different durations.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2007 May; 75(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 17293061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 25515591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exclusive preference develops less readily on concurrent ratio schedules with wheel-running than with sucrose reinforcement.
    Belke TW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):135-58. PubMed ID: 21451744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contingency discriminability and the generalized matching law describe choice on concurrent ratio schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 22414348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Running and responding reinforced by the opportunity to run: effect of reinforcer duration.
    Belke TW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 May; 67(3):337-51. PubMed ID: 9163938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Varying wheel-running reinforcer duration within a session: effect on the revolution-postreinforcement pause relation.
    Belke TW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Mar; 73(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 10784011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer.
    Fantino E; Squires N; Delbrück N; Peterson C
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Jul; 18(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 16811616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Body weight manipulation, reinforcement value and choice between sucrose and wheel running: a behavioral economic analysis.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD
    Behav Processes; 2009 Feb; 80(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 19063951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The general matching law describes choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Belliveau J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 May; 75(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 11453620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for positive, but not negative, behavioral contrast with wheel-running reinforcement on multiple variable-ratio schedules.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD
    Behav Processes; 2016 Dec; 133():37-43. PubMed ID: 27826007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tests of transitivity in choices between fixed and variable reinforcer delays.
    Mazur JE; Coe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 May; 47(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 3612019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concurrent VR VI schedules: primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A; Sakagami T
    Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):382-93. PubMed ID: 21048229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcement value and substitutability of sucrose and wheel running: implications for activity anorexia.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD; Duncan ID
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):131-58. PubMed ID: 17002224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity to pre- and post-reinforcer delays in self-control choice.
    Yamaguchi T; Saeki D; Ito M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():8-12. PubMed ID: 26456039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effects of sucrose concentration and wheel-running reinforcer duration.
    Belke TW; Hancock SD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Mar; 79(2):243-65. PubMed ID: 12822690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative sensitivity to reinforcer amount and delay in a self-control choice situation.
    Ito M; Oyama M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Sep; 66(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 8843691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.