These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16788410)

  • 1. Interview, Dean's Letter, and Affective Domain Issues.
    Mallott D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Aug; 449():56-61. PubMed ID: 16788410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re-engineering the resident applicant selection process in ophthalmology: a literature review and recommendations for improvement.
    Lee AG; Golnik KC; Oetting TA; Beaver HA; Boldt HC; Olson R; Greenlee E; Abramoff MD; Johnson AT; Carter K
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2008; 53(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 18348881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resident selection: a key to the future of orthopaedics.
    Evarts CM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Aug; 449():39-43. PubMed ID: 16788399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The process of resident selection: a view from the residency director's desk.
    Taylor CA; Weinstein L; Mayhew HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Feb; 85(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 7824250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between dean's letter rankings and later evaluations by residency program directors.
    Lurie SJ; Lambert DR; Grady-Weliky TA
    Teach Learn Med; 2007; 19(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 17594220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application submission date reflects applicant quality.
    Fuhrman GM; Dada S; Ehleben C
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 19059168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analysis of orthopaedic residency selection criteria.
    Bernstein AD; Jazrawi LM; Elbeshbeshy B; Della Valle CJ; Zuckerman JD
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2002-2003; 61(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 12828380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Becoming an emergency medicine resident: a practical guide for medical students.
    Lotfipour S; Luu R; Hayden SR; Vaca F; Hoonpongsimanont W; Langdorf M
    J Emerg Med; 2008 Oct; 35(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 18547776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preferences of program directors for evaluation of candidates for postgraduate training.
    Provan JL; Cuttress L
    CMAJ; 1995 Oct; 153(7):919-23. PubMed ID: 7553493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative performance information in the dean's letter.
    Curry RH; Yarnold PR; Wallace WH
    Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():24-9. PubMed ID: 3218863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new approach to standardizing the dean's letter.
    Wagoner NE; Suriano JR
    Acad Med; 1989 Nov; 64(11):688-9. PubMed ID: 2803435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of medical school admissions criteria in predicting residency ranking four years later.
    Peskun C; Detsky A; Shandling M
    Med Educ; 2007 Jan; 41(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17209893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Commentary: Accurate medical student performance evaluations and professionalism assessment: "Yes, we can!".
    Green M; Zick A; Thomas JX
    Acad Med; 2010 Jul; 85(7):1105-7. PubMed ID: 20592502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of medical students to admission interviews.
    Koc T; Katona C; Rees PJ
    Med Educ; 2008 Mar; 42(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 18221267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Medical students admitted by interviews as good as the rest of the students in examination following internship. They were also younger at the time of the final examination].
    Bågedahl-Strindlund M; Mårtensson B; Fredrikson S
    Lakartidningen; 2008 Nov 26-Dec 9; 105(48-49):3522-5. PubMed ID: 19133579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of selection in medical school admissions: evaluation of the outcomes among freshmen.
    Hulsman RL; van der Ende JS; Oort FJ; Michels RP; Casteelen G; Griffioen FM
    Med Educ; 2007 Apr; 41(4):369-77. PubMed ID: 17430282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are we treating professionalism professionally? Medical school behavior as predictors of future outcomes.
    Prasad V
    Teach Learn Med; 2011 Oct; 23(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 22004318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Matriculating student perceptions of changes to the admissions interview process at the University of Wisconsin Medical School: a prospective, controlled comparison.
    Albanese MA; Snow M; Skochelak S; Huggett K; Farrell PM
    WMJ; 2003; 102(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 12754905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The "good" dean's letter.
    Kiefer CS; Colletti JE; Bellolio MF; Hess EP; Woolridge DP; Thomas KB; Sadosty AT
    Acad Med; 2010 Nov; 85(11):1705-8. PubMed ID: 20881821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The personal interview: assessing the potential for personality similarity to bias the selection of orthopaedic residents.
    Quintero AJ; Segal LS; King TS; Black KP
    Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10):1364-72. PubMed ID: 19881423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.