235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16788410)
1. Interview, Dean's Letter, and Affective Domain Issues.
Mallott D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Aug; 449():56-61. PubMed ID: 16788410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re-engineering the resident applicant selection process in ophthalmology: a literature review and recommendations for improvement.
Lee AG; Golnik KC; Oetting TA; Beaver HA; Boldt HC; Olson R; Greenlee E; Abramoff MD; Johnson AT; Carter K
Surv Ophthalmol; 2008; 53(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 18348881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Resident selection: a key to the future of orthopaedics.
Evarts CM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Aug; 449():39-43. PubMed ID: 16788399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The process of resident selection: a view from the residency director's desk.
Taylor CA; Weinstein L; Mayhew HE
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Feb; 85(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 7824250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between dean's letter rankings and later evaluations by residency program directors.
Lurie SJ; Lambert DR; Grady-Weliky TA
Teach Learn Med; 2007; 19(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 17594220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application submission date reflects applicant quality.
Fuhrman GM; Dada S; Ehleben C
J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 19059168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An analysis of orthopaedic residency selection criteria.
Bernstein AD; Jazrawi LM; Elbeshbeshy B; Della Valle CJ; Zuckerman JD
Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2002-2003; 61(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 12828380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Becoming an emergency medicine resident: a practical guide for medical students.
Lotfipour S; Luu R; Hayden SR; Vaca F; Hoonpongsimanont W; Langdorf M
J Emerg Med; 2008 Oct; 35(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 18547776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preferences of program directors for evaluation of candidates for postgraduate training.
Provan JL; Cuttress L
CMAJ; 1995 Oct; 153(7):919-23. PubMed ID: 7553493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative performance information in the dean's letter.
Curry RH; Yarnold PR; Wallace WH
Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():24-9. PubMed ID: 3218863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new approach to standardizing the dean's letter.
Wagoner NE; Suriano JR
Acad Med; 1989 Nov; 64(11):688-9. PubMed ID: 2803435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of medical school admissions criteria in predicting residency ranking four years later.
Peskun C; Detsky A; Shandling M
Med Educ; 2007 Jan; 41(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17209893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Commentary: Accurate medical student performance evaluations and professionalism assessment: "Yes, we can!".
Green M; Zick A; Thomas JX
Acad Med; 2010 Jul; 85(7):1105-7. PubMed ID: 20592502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contribution of medical students to admission interviews.
Koc T; Katona C; Rees PJ
Med Educ; 2008 Mar; 42(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 18221267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Medical students admitted by interviews as good as the rest of the students in examination following internship. They were also younger at the time of the final examination].
Bågedahl-Strindlund M; Mårtensson B; Fredrikson S
Lakartidningen; 2008 Nov 26-Dec 9; 105(48-49):3522-5. PubMed ID: 19133579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of selection in medical school admissions: evaluation of the outcomes among freshmen.
Hulsman RL; van der Ende JS; Oort FJ; Michels RP; Casteelen G; Griffioen FM
Med Educ; 2007 Apr; 41(4):369-77. PubMed ID: 17430282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are we treating professionalism professionally? Medical school behavior as predictors of future outcomes.
Prasad V
Teach Learn Med; 2011 Oct; 23(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 22004318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Matriculating student perceptions of changes to the admissions interview process at the University of Wisconsin Medical School: a prospective, controlled comparison.
Albanese MA; Snow M; Skochelak S; Huggett K; Farrell PM
WMJ; 2003; 102(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 12754905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The "good" dean's letter.
Kiefer CS; Colletti JE; Bellolio MF; Hess EP; Woolridge DP; Thomas KB; Sadosty AT
Acad Med; 2010 Nov; 85(11):1705-8. PubMed ID: 20881821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The personal interview: assessing the potential for personality similarity to bias the selection of orthopaedic residents.
Quintero AJ; Segal LS; King TS; Black KP
Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10):1364-72. PubMed ID: 19881423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
