These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16789303)

  • 1. Case study: agency says institutional review board (IRB) failed to warn subjects of significant problems.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Mar; 21(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 16789303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Case study: research subject says institutional review board (IRB) was no help.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Jan; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 16789306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research subject complains about how she was treated by an institutional review board (IRB).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Dec; 20(12):7. PubMed ID: 16607709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Case study: agency says institutional review board (IRB) did not fulfill duties so agency investigation expands.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Apr; 21(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 16832919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Case study: institutional review board (IRB) did not know about subject problem until after study.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 May; 21(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 16832916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Case study: research subject says institutional review board (IRB) would not answer her questions.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Feb; 21(2):7. PubMed ID: 16789309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Untapped potential: IRB guidance for the ethical research use of stored biological materials.
    Wolf LE; Lo B
    IRB; 2004; 26(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 15449408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The basics of human subjects protection.
    Yoder LH
    Medsurg Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(2):95-8; quiz 99. PubMed ID: 16700248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continued concern: human subject protection, the institutional review board, and continuing review.
    Hoffman S
    Tenn Law Rev; 2001; 68(4):725-70. PubMed ID: 16189912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. University uses "implied informed consent".
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Mar; 20(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 15856566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Angry father accuses researcher of violating his family's privacy.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2004 Dec; 19(12):6-7. PubMed ID: 15810179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Case study: university finally can resume human subjects research again.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Aug; 21(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 17058815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Offering results to research subjects: U.S. Institutional Review Board policy.
    Kozanczyn C; Collins K; Fernandez CV
    Account Res; 2007; 14(4):255-67. PubMed ID: 18246944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New guidance on when and how to report human research problems.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 16270442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why wasn't an investigational new drug (IND) application required before appropriate study?
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2004 Mar; 19(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 15139342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerous violations of federal informed consent requirements.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2004 Jan; 19(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 14997901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concept paper: a virtual centralized IRB system.
    McWilliams R; Hebden CW; Gilpin AM
    Account Res; 2006; 13(1):25-45. PubMed ID: 16770858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of warning letters issued to institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.
    Bramstedt KA; Kassimatis K
    Clin Invest Med; 2004 Dec; 27(6):316-23. PubMed ID: 15675112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. IRB opts for "user friendly" letter rather than an informed consent form.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jan; 20(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 15810183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.