These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16789939)

  • 1. DNA fingerprinting and civil liberties.
    Noble AA
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 16789939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DNA databanks: when has a good thing gone too far?
    Herlica DA
    Syracuse Law Rev; 2002; 52(3):951-77. PubMed ID: 15212076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who needs special needs? On the constitutionality of collecting DNA and other biometric data from arrestees.
    Kaye DH
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 16789942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canada's DNA databank: public safety and private costs.
    Parfett J
    Manit Law J; 2002; 29(1):33-79. PubMed ID: 16514758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expanding databases, declining liberties.
    Simoncelli T; Wallace H
    Genewatch; 2006; 19(1):3-8, 18. PubMed ID: 16789300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comment: DNA as property: implications on the constitutionality of DNA dragnets.
    Will JF
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 2003; 65(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 15568272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reclaiming "abandoned" DNA: the Fourth Amendment and genetic privacy.
    Joh EE
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2006; 100(2):857-84. PubMed ID: 17340772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing Fourth Amendment challenges to DNA extraction statutes after Samson v. California.
    Nerko CJ
    Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Nov; 77(2):917-49. PubMed ID: 19353834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Criminal DNA data banks: revolution for law enforcement or threat to individual privacy?
    Yee YH
    Am J Crim Law; 1995; 22(2):461-90. PubMed ID: 11655161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Willing to give up their DNA, but privacy too?
    Donnan S
    Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Apr; 92(99):1, 9. PubMed ID: 15586925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA databases: when fear goes too far.
    Peterson RS
    Am Crim Law Rev; 2000; 37(3):1219-38. PubMed ID: 11958233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DNA profiles, computer searches, and the Fourth Amendment.
    Kimel CW
    Duke Law J; 2013; 62(4):933-73. PubMed ID: 23461001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.
    Juengst ET
    Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention of offender DNA samples necessary to ensure and monitor quality of forensic DNA efforts: appropriate safeguards exist to protect the DNA samples from misuse.
    Herkenham MD
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 16789959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statutory frameworks for regulating information flows: drawing lessons for the DNA data banks from other government data systems.
    Lazer D; Mayer-Schönberger V
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):366-74. PubMed ID: 16789957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When privacy fails: invoking a property paradigm to mandate the destruction of DNA samples.
    Harlan LM
    Duke Law J; 2004 Oct; 53(7):179-219. PubMed ID: 15736315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mandatory genetic dogtags and the Fourth Amendment: the need for a new post-Skinner test.
    Scherer RC
    Georgetown Law J; 1997 Jun; 85(6):2007-38. PubMed ID: 16523576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stop taking uncivil liberties with DNA.
    Kennedy H
    New Sci; 2004 Mar 20-26; 181(2439):20-1. PubMed ID: 15462020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inclusiveness, effectiveness and intrusiveness: issues in the developing uses of DNA profiling in support of criminal investigations.
    Williams R; Johnson P
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(3):545-58. PubMed ID: 16240734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dangerous excursions: the case against expanding forensic DNA databases to innocent persons.
    Simoncelli T
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 16789961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.