152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16789971)
1. Abortion: Supreme Court avoids disturbing abortion precedents by ruling on grounds of Remedy-Ayotte v. planned parenthood of Northern New England.
Law N
J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):469-71. PubMed ID: 16789971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Justices reaffirm abortion access for emergencies.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 16429624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Case reopens abortion issue for justices.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 16450459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The next abortion decision.
N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A34. PubMed ID: 16450474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Court to tackle abortion again after 5 years; parent notification case; in considering technical issues, justices rejoin a fractious debate.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 May; ():A1, A17. PubMed ID: 15948341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution.
Hayhurst MB
Mont Law Rev; 1997; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Special weight" for best-interests minors in the new era of parental autonomy.
Storrow RF; Martinez S
Wis L Rev; 2003; (5):789-841. PubMed ID: 16437822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
Bertuglia J
Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An unjust act: the schizophrenic state of maturity and culpability in juvenile justice and minor abortion rights law; recent trends in Virginia and nationally.
Foxworth JM
William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):495-533. PubMed ID: 15977329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Recent Supreme Court decisions.
Schulte DJ
Mich Med; 2006; 105(2):6. PubMed ID: 16669465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
Ehrlich JS
Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. North Florida Women's Health Services v. State.
Florida. Supreme Court
Wests South Report; 2003; 866():612-74. PubMed ID: 16479690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association between the New Hampshire parental notification law and minors undergoing abortions in northern New England.
MacAfee L; Castle J; Theiler RN
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 125(1):170-174. PubMed ID: 25560121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mother, may I?: ramifications for parental involvement laws for minors seeking abortion services.
Blasdell J
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 16526133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II.
Graziano SG
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Planned Parenthood of Central New Jersey v. Farmer.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Wests Atl Report; 2000; 762():620-47. PubMed ID: 16477733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Court, in effect, rejects parent notification.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1996 Apr; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11647498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. House passes abortion bill on minors.
N Y Times Web; 2006 Sep; ():A23. PubMed ID: 17014048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
Scuder AC
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
Ehrlich JS
Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
