These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16789971)
21. Parental consent to abortion: how enforcement can vary. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11647920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Planned Parenthood of Rocky Mountains v. Owens. United States. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Wests Fed Rep; 2002; 287():910-35. PubMed ID: 16477721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors. O'Shaughnessy M Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative. Green W Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents. Ehrlich JS Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Privacy issues for girls are in the news and in BJN. Foss TD Br J Nurs; 2006 Jan 26-Feb 8; 15(2):65. PubMed ID: 16493277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The undue burden: parental notification requirements for publicly funded contraception. Bornstein S Berkeley Womens Law J; 2000; 15():40-75. PubMed ID: 16518901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Planned Parenthood of Blue Ridge v. Camblos. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Fed Report; 1998 Aug; 155():352-92. PubMed ID: 11648641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Senate removes abortion option for young girls. Hulse C N Y Times Web; 2006 Jul; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 16909491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Right to abortion limited: the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of parental notification statutes. Byrne TJ Loyola Law Rev; 1982; 28(1):281-96. PubMed ID: 11658437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Misconceived laws: the irrationality of parental involvement requirements for contraception. Arons JR William Mary Law Rev; 2000 Mar; 41(3):1093-131. PubMed ID: 16329212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Review of abortion policy: legality, medicaid funding, and parental involvement, 1967-1994. Merz JF; Jackson CA; Klerman JA Womens Rights Law Report; 1995; 17(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11863033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. H.L. v. Matheson: parental notice prior to abortion. Medler MA St Louis Univ Law J; 1982 Jan; 26(2):426-46. PubMed ID: 11655739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Family law I: abortion. Koscs ME Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Planned Parenthood Association of Atlanta Area v. Harris. U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division Fed Suppl; 1987 Sep; 670():971-98. PubMed ID: 11648379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. When is a pregnant minor mature? When is an abortion in her best interests? The Ohio Supreme Court applies Ohio's Abortion Parental Notification Law: In re Jane Doe 1. Stuhlbarg SF Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1992; 60(3):907-61. PubMed ID: 11651633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Abortion: a new round. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Workability of the undue burden test. Schneider EA Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]