These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16790148)

  • 1. Detecting genotype-environment interaction in monozygotic twin data: comparing the Jinks and Fulker test and a new test based on Marginal Maximum Likelihood estimation.
    van der Sluis S; Dolan CV; Neale MC; Boomsma DI; Posthuma D
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Jun; 9(3):377-92. PubMed ID: 16790148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting specific genotype by environment interactions using marginal maximum likelihood estimation in the classical twin design.
    Molenaar D; van der Sluis S; Boomsma DI; Dolan CV
    Behav Genet; 2012 May; 42(3):483-99. PubMed ID: 22146987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A generalized Defries-Fulker regression framework for the analysis of twin data.
    Lazzeroni LC; Ray A
    Behav Genet; 2013 Jan; 43(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 23264207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A finite mixture model for genotype and environment interactions: detecting latent population heterogeneity.
    Gillespie NA; Neale MC
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Jun; 9(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 16790151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A test of the equal environment assumption (EEA) in multivariate twin studies.
    Derks EM; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Jun; 9(3):403-11. PubMed ID: 16790150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Operating Characteristics of Statistical Methods for Detecting Gene-by-Measured Environment Interaction in the Presence of Gene-Environment Correlation under Violations of Distributional Assumptions.
    Van Hulle CA; Rathouz PJ
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2015 Feb; 18(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 25584702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple regression analysis of twin data: a model-fitting approach.
    Cherny SS; DeFries JC; Fulker DW
    Behav Genet; 1992 Jul; 22(4):489-97. PubMed ID: 1503550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approximate solutions for the maximum-likelihood estimates in models of univariate human twin data.
    Wijesiri UW; Williams CJ
    Behav Genet; 1995 May; 25(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 7598664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Twin concordances test for ascertained trichotomous traits data.
    Huang JK; Tai JJ
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):869-94. PubMed ID: 16685706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision and bias of a normal finite mixture distribution model to analyze twin data when zygosity is unknown: simulations and application to IQ phenotypes on a large sample of twin pairs.
    Benyamin B; Deary IJ; Visscher PM
    Behav Genet; 2006 Nov; 36(6):935-46. PubMed ID: 16786426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semiparametric maximum likelihood variance component estimation using mixture moment structure models.
    Markon KE
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Jun; 9(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 16790146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of analysis of variance and maximum likelihood based path analysis of twin data: partitioning genetic and environmental sources of covariance.
    Christian JC; Norton JA; Sorbel J; Williams CJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 7713398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal genetic effects estimation in family and twin studies using random-effects models.
    Tsonaka R; van der Woude D; Houwing-Duistermaat J
    Biometrics; 2015 Dec; 71(4):1130-8. PubMed ID: 26148843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power of the classical twin design revisited.
    Visscher PM
    Twin Res; 2004 Oct; 7(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 15527666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical power to detect genetic Loci affecting environmental sensitivity.
    Visscher PM; Posthuma D
    Behav Genet; 2010 Sep; 40(5):728-33. PubMed ID: 20428936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Likelihood-based concordance tests for analysis of ascertained twin pair multinomial data.
    Huang JK; Liu AY; Tai JJ
    Stat Med; 2012 Jan; 31(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 22052434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Latent curve analyses of longitudinal twin data using a mixed-effects biometric approach.
    McArdle JJ
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Jun; 9(3):343-59. PubMed ID: 16790145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic susceptibility to prostate, breast, and colorectal cancer among Nordic twins.
    Baker SG; Lichtenstein P; Kaprio J; Holm N
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15737078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Not really identical: epigenetic differences in monozygotic twins and implications for twin studies in psychiatry.
    Haque FN; Gottesman II; Wong AH
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2009 May; 151C(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19378334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of methods for analyzing binary data arising from two-sample twin studies.
    Gao XJ; Klar N; Donner A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(4):349-63. PubMed ID: 9271709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.