These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16791434)

  • 1. Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty.
    Yoon DH; Yi S; Shin HC; Kim KN; Kim SH
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 Sep; 148(9):943-50. PubMed ID: 16791434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Xu JX; Zhang YZ; Shen Y; Ding WY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1012-7. PubMed ID: 19404176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty.
    Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Hipp JA; Wharton ND; Anderson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):991-6. PubMed ID: 21358477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine.
    Kim SW; Shin JH; Arbatin JJ; Park MS; Chung YK; McAfee PC
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Jan; 17(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 17721713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postoperative segmental malalignment after surgery with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: is it related to the mechanics and design of the prosthesis?
    Walraevens JR; Liu B; Sloten JV; Demaerel P; Goffin J
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):372-6. PubMed ID: 20124918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.
    Lazaro BC; Yucesoy K; Yuksel KZ; Kowalczyk I; Rabin D; Fink M; Duggal N
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
    Sasso RC; Best NM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.
    Shim CS; Lee SH; Park HJ; Kang HS; Hwang JH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Oct; 19(7):465-70. PubMed ID: 17021408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Segmental malalignment with the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis--does it occur?
    Sears WR; Sekhon LH; Duggal N; Williamson OD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17285044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anterior transvertebral herniotomy for cervical disc herniation: a long-term follow-up study.
    Sakai T; Katoh S; Sairyo K; Tamura T; Hirohashi N; Higashino K; Yasui N
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Aug; 22(6):408-12. PubMed ID: 19652566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adjacent-level arthroplasty following cervical fusion.
    Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Konar S; Sharma A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Feb; 42(2):E5. PubMed ID: 28142281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
    Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages.
    Elsawaf A; Mastronardi L; Roperto R; Bozzao A; Caroli M; Ferrante L
    Neurosurg Rev; 2009 Apr; 32(2):215-24; discussion 224. PubMed ID: 18846395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc.
    Kowalczyk I; Lazaro BC; Fink M; Rabin D; Duggal N
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Dec; 15(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 21905776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and radiological analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up results compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Lei T; Liu Y; Wang H; Xu J; Ma Q; Wang L; Shen Y
    Int Orthop; 2016 Jun; 40(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 26744166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Kim SW; Paik SH; Castro PA; Baek SW; Shin DJ; Kwak YH; Ju YS
    Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):683-8. PubMed ID: 20537960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
    Heller JG; Sasso RC; Papadopoulos SM; Anderson PA; Fessler RG; Hacker RJ; Coric D; Cauthen JC; Riew DK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 19112337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment.
    Pickett GE; Mitsis DK; Sekhon LH; Sears WR; Duggal N
    Neurosurg Focus; 2004 Sep; 17(3):E5. PubMed ID: 15636561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in cervical range of motion and sagittal alignment in early and late phases after total disc replacement: radiographic follow-up exceeding 2 years.
    Ahn PG; Kim KN; Moon SW; Kim KS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):688-95. PubMed ID: 19951021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiologically documented adjacent-segment degeneration after cervical arthroplasty: characteristics and review of cases.
    Yi S; Lee DY; Ahn PG; Kim KN; Yoon DH; Shin HC
    Surg Neurol; 2009 Oct; 72(4):325-9; discussion 329. PubMed ID: 19665192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.