213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16791597)
1. FDG-PET and CT patterns of bone metastases and their relationship to previously administered anti-cancer therapy.
Israel O; Goldberg A; Nachtigal A; Militianu D; Bar-Shalom R; Keidar Z; Fogelman I
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Nov; 33(11):1280-4. PubMed ID: 16791597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fusion of metabolic function and morphology: sequential [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography studies yield new insights into the natural history of bone metastases in breast cancer.
Du Y; Cullum I; Illidge TM; Ell PJ
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Aug; 25(23):3440-7. PubMed ID: 17592153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positron emission tomography and bone metastases.
Fogelman I; Cook G; Israel O; Van der Wall H
Semin Nucl Med; 2005 Apr; 35(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 15765376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and (99m)Tc-MDP whole-body bone scanning for imaging osteolytic bone metastases.
Zhang L; Chen L; Xie Q; Zhang Y; Cheng L; Li H; Wang J
BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Mar; 15():7. PubMed ID: 25885599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pitfalls of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Nakai T; Okuyama C; Kubota T; Yamada K; Ushijima Y; Taniike K; Suzuki T; Nishimura T
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Nov; 32(11):1253-8. PubMed ID: 16133397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical relevance of 18F-FDG-negative osteoblastic metastatic bone lesions noted on PET/CT in breast cancer patients.
Al-Muqbel KM; Yaghan RJ; Al-Omari MH; Rousan LA; Dagher NM; Al Bashir S
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Jun; 37(6):593-601. PubMed ID: 26813990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT with (99m)Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in cancer patients.
Ozülker T; Küçüköz Uzun A; Ozülker F; Ozpaçac T
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jun; 31(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 20224457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer.
Hahn S; Heusner T; Kümmel S; Köninger A; Nagarajah J; Müller S; Boy C; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Stahl A
Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):1009-14. PubMed ID: 21969709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of bone involvement in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: preliminary results.
Nanni C; Zamagni E; Farsad M; Castellucci P; Tosi P; Cangini D; Salizzoni E; Canini R; Cavo M; Fanti S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 May; 33(5):525-31. PubMed ID: 16453155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the diagnostic and prognostic values of 99mTc-MDP-planar bone scintigraphy, 131I-SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer.
Qiu ZL; Xue YL; Song HJ; Luo QY
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Dec; 33(12):1232-42. PubMed ID: 23111353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disseminated osteomyelitis or bone metastases of breast cancer: (18)F-FDG-PET/CT helps unravel an unusual presentation.
Mandegaran R; Debard A; Alvarez M; Marchou B; Massip P; Wagner T
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 28(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 24203488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appearance of untreated bone metastases from breast cancer on FDG PET/CT: importance of histologic subtype.
Dashevsky BZ; Goldman DA; Parsons M; Gönen M; Corben AD; Jochelson MS; Hudis CA; Morrow M; Ulaner GA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(11):1666-1673. PubMed ID: 25971426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 18F-FDG PET/CT is a prognostic biomarker in patients affected by bone metastases from breast cancer in comparison with 18F-NaF PET/CT.
Piccardo A; Puntoni M; Morbelli S; Massollo M; Bongioanni F; Paparo F; Altrinetti V; Gonella R; Gennari A; Iacozzi M; Sambuceti G; DeCensi A
Nuklearmedizin; 2015; 54(4):163-72. PubMed ID: 26165806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT imaging of bone and bone marrow infiltration in malignant melanoma--Challenges and limitations for clinical staging in comparison to 18FDG-PET/CT.
Bier G; Hoffmann V; Kloth C; Othman AE; Eigentler T; Garbe C; La Fougère C; Pfannenberg C; Nikolaou K; Klumpp B
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):732-8. PubMed ID: 26971416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved detection of bone metastases from lung cancer in the thoracic cage using 5- and 1-mm axial images versus a new CT software generating rib unfolding images: comparison with standard ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT.
Homann G; Mustafa DF; Ditt H; Spengler W; Kopp HG; Nikolaou K; Horger M
Acad Radiol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 25586709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 18F-FDG-PET/MR increases diagnostic confidence in detection of bone metastases compared with 18F-FDG-PET/CT.
Samarin A; Hüllner M; Queiroz MA; Stolzmann P; Burger IA; von Schulthess G; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Dec; 36(12):1165-73. PubMed ID: 26397999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The clinical value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases undetermined origin.
Hu J; Zhang X; Li B; Zhang M; Wang C; Chen G
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(5):922-4. PubMed ID: 23849830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "One-stop-shop" staging: should we prefer FDG-PET/CT or MRI for the detection of bone metastases?
Heusner T; Gölitz P; Hamami M; Eberhardt W; Esser S; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 19945240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Pretreatment Combined (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Staging on Radiation Therapy Treatment Decisions in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.
Ng SP; David S; Alamgeer M; Ganju V
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Sep; 93(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 26279029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Progressive osteoblastic bone metastases in breast cancer negative on FDG-PET.
Huyge V; Garcia C; Vanderstappen A; Alexiou J; Gil T; Flamen P
Clin Nucl Med; 2009 Jul; 34(7):417-20. PubMed ID: 19542943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
