These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16792054)

  • 21. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
    Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-year clinical follow-up of posterior teeth restored with leucite-reinforced ips empress onlays and partial veneer crowns.
    Murgueitio R; Bernal G
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 22372380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Internal and marginal adaptation of pressable and computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture onlay restorations.
    Vanlioglu BA; Evren B; Yildiz C; Uludamar A; Ozkan YK
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(3):262-4. PubMed ID: 22545256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years.
    Krämer N; Ebert J; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16122784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Otto T; De Nisco S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Remakes of Colorlogic and IPS Empress ceramic restorations in general practice.
    Hekland H; Riise T; Berg E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 14714841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years.
    Spitznagel FA; Scholz KJ; Strub JR; Vach K; Gierthmuehlen PC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jun; 22(5):1973-1983. PubMed ID: 29214376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite.
    Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15119879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of surface finish and fatigue testing on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM and pressed-ceramic crowns.
    Chen HY; Hickel R; Setcos JC; Kunzelmann KH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 82(4):468-75. PubMed ID: 10512968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks.
    El-Damanhoury HM; Haj-Ali RN; Platt JA
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 25268039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays.
    Audenino G; Bresciano ME; Bassi F; Carossa S
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 10635204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
    Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems.
    Romão W; Miranda WG; Cesar PF; Braga RR
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 15088734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years--a clinical study.
    Krämer N; Frankenberger R; Pelka M; Petschelt A
    J Dent; 1999 Jul; 27(5):325-31. PubMed ID: 10377606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
    Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study.
    Etman MK; Woolford MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 20141812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays made with two systems: a one-year follow-up.
    Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Francischone CE; Lauris JR; de Lima NM
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 15779320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.
    Molin MK; Karlsson SL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.