316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16792244)
1. A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains.
Bokas J; Woods M
Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16792244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Canine and molar movement, rotation and tipping by NiTi coils versus elastomeric chains in first maxillary premolar extraction orthodontic adolescents: A randomized split-mouth study.
Hashemzadeh H; Soleimani M; Golbar M; Dehghani Soltani A; Mirmalek SP
Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100601. PubMed ID: 34866026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of elastic memory chains versus nickel-titanium coil springs in canine retraction: A two-center split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
Khanemasjedi M; Moradinejad M; Javidi P; Niknam O; Jahromi NH; Rakhshan V
Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):561-574. PubMed ID: 29153282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of space closure rates between preactivated nickel-titanium and titanium-molybdenum alloy T-loops: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Keng FY; Quick AN; Swain MV; Herbison P
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 21415288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.
Yee JA; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Cheng LL; Darendeliler MA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical investigation of force delivery systems for orthodontic space closure.
Nightingale C; Jones SP
J Orthod; 2003 Sep; 30(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 14530421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthodontic space closure in sliding mechanics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sebastian B; Bhuvaraghan A; Thiruvenkatachari B
Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 44(2):210-225. PubMed ID: 34609513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
Shpack N; Davidovitch M; Sarne O; Panayi N; Vardimon AD
Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical efficiency of nonconventional elastomeric ligatures in the canine retraction phase of preadjusted edgewise appliance therapy: an in-vivo study.
Dholakia KD; Bhat SR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):715-22. PubMed ID: 22640673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study.
da Costa Monini A; Júnior LG; Martins RP; Vianna AP
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of nickel-titanium springs vs elastomeric chains in orthodontic space closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mohammed H; Rizk MZ; Wafaie K; Almuzian M
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2018 Feb; 21(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 29265578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Canine Retraction Using a Closed Nickel Titanium Coil Spring and an Elastic Module.
Khalid Z; Bangash AA; Anwar A; Pasha H; Amin E
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 Sep; 28(9):695-698. PubMed ID: 30158036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anchorage loss during canine retraction using intermittent versus continuous force distractions; a split mouth randomized clinical trial.
Mowafy MI; Zaher AR
Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 23021114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehensive comparison of canine retraction using NiTi closed coil springs vs elastomeric chains.
Barsoum HA; ElSayed HS; El Sharaby FA; Palomo JM; Mostafa YA
Angle Orthod; 2021 Jul; 91(4):441-448. PubMed ID: 34181721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction.
Abbas NH; Sabet NE; Hassan IT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 27021451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized clinical trial to compare three methods of orthodontic space closure.
Dixon V; Read MJ; O'Brien KD; Worthington HV; Mandall NA
J Orthod; 2002 Mar; 29(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 11907307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nickel titanium springs versus stainless steel springs: A randomized clinical trial of two methods of space closure.
Norman NH; Worthington H; Chadwick SM
J Orthod; 2016 Sep; 43(3):176-85. PubMed ID: 26836747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unilateral distalization of a maxillary molar with sliding mechanics: a case report.
Keles A
J Orthod; 2002 Jun; 29(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 12114457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
