316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16792244)
21. An in vitro comparison of the force decay generated by different commercially available elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs.
Santos AC; Tortamano A; Naccarato SR; Dominguez-Rodriguez GC; Vigorito JW
Braz Oral Res; 2007; 21(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17384855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Clinical study of Twin-wires on anchorage on canine retraction].
Wang GH; Liu P; Ou YM
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Jun; 15(3):332-4. PubMed ID: 16862375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Group A T-loop for differential moment mechanics: an implant study.
Martins RP; Buschang PH; Gandini LG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 19201324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the orthodontic load systems created with elastomeric power chain to close extraction spaces on different rectangular archwires.
Kroczek C; Kula K; Stewart K; Baldwin J; Fu T; Chen J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):262-268. PubMed ID: 22381486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Does the bracket-ligature combination affect the amount of orthodontic space closure over three months? A randomized controlled trial.
Wong H; Collins J; Tinsley D; Sandler J; Benson P
J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 40(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 23794696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative photoelastic study of dental and skeletal anchorages in the canine retraction.
de Assis Claro CA; Chagas RV; Neves AC; da Silva-Concílio LR
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 24713566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [An in vitro study of the stretching time-associated force loss generated by elastomeric chains and NiTi closed coil springs].
Shaddud AN; Kosyreva TF
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2018; 97(6):13-16. PubMed ID: 30589418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of miniplates and teeth for orthodontic anchorage.
Kim S; Herring S; Wang IC; Alcalde R; Mak V; Fu I; Huang G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):189.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18249283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics.
Aboul-Ela SM; El-Beialy AR; El-Sayed KM; Selim EM; El-Mangoury NH; Mostafa YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 21300255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Anchorage value of surgical titanium screws in orthodontic tooth movement.
Hedayati Z; Hashemi SM; Zamiri B; Fattahi HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):588-92. PubMed ID: 17524619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Alkaline phosphatase activity in gingival crevicular fluid during canine retraction.
Batra P; Kharbanda O; Duggal R; Singh N; Parkash H
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 Feb; 9(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 16420274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Distalization of maxillary molars with Modified Greenfield Appliance and Modified Nance Appliance as applied to specific case.
Palencar AJ
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2006; 17(3):41-6. PubMed ID: 17091923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Pavithranand A; Rajasigamani K; Kyung HM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):551-4. PubMed ID: 16627183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction.
Al-Jundi A; Sabbagh BA; Baskaradoss JK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Effect of Using Self-ligating Brackets on Maxillary Canine Retraction: A Split-mouth Design Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hassan SE; Hajeer MY; Alali OH; Kaddah AS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jun; 17(6):496-503. PubMed ID: 27484605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effectiveness of laceback ligatures on maxillary canine retraction.
Sueri MY; Turk T
Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 17090165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical outcomes of cases with missing lateral incisors treated with the 'T'-Mesialslider.
Kanavakis G; Ludwig B; Rosa M; Zachrisson B; Hourfar J
J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S33-8. PubMed ID: 25138364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vivo comparison of force decay between injection molded and die-cut stamped elastomers.
Bousquet JA; Tuesta O; Flores-Mir C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 16527634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing patient-centered outcomes and efficiency of space closure between nickel-titanium closed-coil springs and elastomeric power chains during orthodontic treatment.
Badran SA; Al-Zaben JM; Al-Taie LM; Tbeishi H; Al-Omiri MK
Angle Orthod; 2022 Jul; 92(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 35348615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of lower canine retraction and loss of anchorage between conventional and self-ligating brackets: a single-center randomized split-mouth controlled trial.
da Costa Monini A; Júnior LGG; Vianna AP; Martins RP
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1047-1053. PubMed ID: 27246754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
