129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16792827)
1. Cervical screening in 20-24-year olds.
Rieck GC; Tristram A; Hauke A; Fielder H; Fiander AN
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):64-71; discussion 62-3. PubMed ID: 16792827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of screening episodes linked to CIN3 and invasive cancer registrations to study outcomes from the NHS Cervical Screening Programme.
Blanks RG; Moss SM; Coleman DA; Addou S; Swerdlow AJ
Cytopathology; 2009 Jun; 20(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 19207309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dramatic increase in cervical cancer registrations in young women in 2009 in England unlikely to be due to the new policy not to screen women aged 20-24.
Sasieni P; Castanon A
J Med Screen; 2012 Sep; 19(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 23093730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical screening: why young women should be encouraged to be screened.
Herbert A; Holdsworth G; Kubba AA
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2008 Jan; 34(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 18201402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. HPV testing compared with routine cytology in cervical screening: long-term follow-up of ARTISTIC RCT.
Gilham C; Sargent A; Kitchener HC; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(28):1-44. PubMed ID: 31219027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The predicted effect of changes in cervical screening practice in the UK: results from a modelling study.
Canfell K; Barnabas R; Patnick J; Beral V
Br J Cancer; 2004 Aug; 91(3):530-6. PubMed ID: 15266332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].
Ronco G; Biggeri A; Confortini M; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Accetta G; Giordano L; Cogo C; Carozzi F; Gillio Tos A; Arbyn M; Mejier CJ; Snijders PJ; Cuzick J; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72. PubMed ID: 22828243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety of extending screening intervals beyond five years in cervical screening programmes with testing for high risk human papillomavirus: 14 year follow-up of population based randomised cohort in the Netherlands.
Dijkstra MG; van Zummeren M; Rozendaal L; van Kemenade FJ; Helmerhorst TJ; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; Berkhof J
BMJ; 2016 Oct; 355():i4924. PubMed ID: 27702796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How many cervical cancers are prevented by treatment of screen-detected disease in young women?
Sasieni P; Castanon A; Parkin DM
Int J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 124(2):461-4. PubMed ID: 18844220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Costs and benefits of different strategies to screen for cervical cancer in less-developed countries.
Mandelblatt JS; Lawrence WF; Gaffikin L; Limpahayom KK; Lumbiganon P; Warakamin S; King J; Yi B; Ringers P; Blumenthal PD
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(19):1469-83. PubMed ID: 12359856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intensified screening among high risk women within the organised screening programme for cervical cancer in Finland.
Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Anttila A; Nieminen P; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 20560860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Ogilvie GS; van Niekerk D; Krajden M; Smith LW; Cook D; Gondara L; Ceballos K; Quinlan D; Lee M; Martin RE; Gentile L; Peacock S; Stuart GCE; Franco EL; Coldman AJ
JAMA; 2018 Jul; 320(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 29971397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial.
Rijkaart DC; Berkhof J; Rozendaal L; van Kemenade FJ; Bulkmans NW; Heideman DA; Kenter GG; Cuzick J; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Lancet Oncol; 2012 Jan; 13(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 22177579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monitoring and evaluation of a model demonstration project for the control of cervical cancer in Nakhon Phanom province, Thailand.
Deerasamee S; Srivatanakul P; Sriplung H; Nilvachararung S; Tansuwan U; Pitakpraiwan P; Kaewkungwal J; Singhasivanon P; Nimnakorn P; Sankaranarayanan R
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(4):547-56. PubMed ID: 18260727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia.
Canfell K; Saville M; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Brotherton J; Heley S; Castle PE
BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e016700. PubMed ID: 29374658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary cervical cancer screening with an HPV mRNA test: a prospective cohort study.
Sørbye SW; Fismen S; Gutteberg TJ; Mortensen ES; Skjeldestad FE
BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011981. PubMed ID: 27515759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Three-year follow-up results of visual inspection with acetic acid/Lugol's iodine (VIA/VILI) used as an alternative screening method for cervical cancer in rural areas].
Zhang YZ; Ma JF; Zhao FH; Xiang XE; Ma ZH; Shi YT; Hu SY; Qiao YL
Chin J Cancer; 2010 Jan; 29(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 20038302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MAVARIC - a comparison of automation-assisted and manual cervical screening: a randomised controlled trial.
Kitchener HC; Blanks R; Cubie H; Desai M; Dunn G; Legood R; Gray A; Sadique Z; Moss S;
Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(3):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-170. PubMed ID: 21266159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer: Results after two screening rounds in a regional screening program in Finland.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Kujala P; Vuento R; Luukkaala T; Kholová I; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Mar; 100(3):403-409. PubMed ID: 33037625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
