269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16792828)
1. The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records.
Canfell K; Beral V; Green J; Cameron R; Baker K; Brown A
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 16792828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathways to diagnosis of cervical cancer: screening history, delay in follow up, and smear reading.
Priest P; Sadler L; Peters J; Crengle S; Bethwaite P; Medley G; Jackson R
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 17166215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study.
Chew-Graham C; Mole E; Evans LJ; Rogers A
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jun; 61(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 15964735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of self-reported Pap smear history in Norwegian women.
Klungsøyr O; Nygård M; Skare G; Eriksen T; Nygård JF
J Med Screen; 2009; 16(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 19564522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An audit of a cervical smear screening programme.
Moodie PJ; Kljakovic M; McLeod DK
N Z Med J; 1989 Jul; 102(872):374-6. PubMed ID: 2797554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement between patient self-reports and medical records for Pap smear histories.
McKenna MT; Speers M; Mallin K; Warnecke R
Am J Prev Med; 1992; 8(5):287-91. PubMed ID: 1419128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The fallacy of the screening interval for cervical smears.
Boyce JG; Fruchter RG; Romanzi L; Sillman FH; Maiman M
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 76(4):627-32. PubMed ID: 2216192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical screening in women over the age of 50: results of a population-based multicentre study.
Flannelly G; Monaghan J; Cruickshank M; Duncan I; Johnson J; Jordan J; Campbell M; Patnick J
BJOG; 2004 Apr; 111(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 15008774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
Schindeler S; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Baker D
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accuracy of Pap smear utilization self-report: a methodological consideration in cervical screening research.
Bowman JA; Redman S; Dickinson JA; Gibberd R; Sanson-Fisher RW
Health Serv Res; 1991 Apr; 26(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 2016170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening history of women in Malmö with invasive cervical cancer.
Lindqvist PG; Hellsten C; Rippe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Mar; 137(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 17210219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical screening in general practice: call and recall.
Ridsdale LL
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Jun; 37(299):257-9. PubMed ID: 3129556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of cervical cancer following negative smears in Maribo County, Denmark, 1966-1982.
Lynge E; Poll P
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):69-86. PubMed ID: 3570417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pap screening in a U.S. health plan.
Insinga RP; Glass AG; Rush BB
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 15006908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study of the women overdue for a smear test in a general practice cervical screening programme.
Meadows P
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Nov; 37(304):500-3. PubMed ID: 3505643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
