192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16793467)
1. A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction.
Williams CB; Joyce AP; Roberts S
J Endod; 2006 Jul; 32(7):624-7. PubMed ID: 16793467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vivo comparative evaluation to determine the accuracy of working length between radiographic and electronic apex locators.
Singh SV; Nikhil V; Singh AV; Yadav S
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 23059573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only root-ZX apex locator versus combining root-ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique.
Kim E; Marmo M; Lee CY; Oh NS; Kim IK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Apr; 105(4):e79-83. PubMed ID: 18329572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators.
Welk AR; Baumgartner JC; Marshall JG
J Endod; 2003 Aug; 29(8):497-500. PubMed ID: 12929694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination.
Kqiku L; Städtler P
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):777-80. PubMed ID: 22484869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison between two electronic apex locators: an ex vivo investigation.
Venturi M; Breschi L
Int Endod J; 2007 May; 40(5):362-73. PubMed ID: 17309741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: Dentaport ZX, Raypex 5 and ProPex II.
Somma F; Castagnola R; Lajolo C; Paternò Holtzman L; Marigo L
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 22257341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histomorphometric study of the root apex of mandibular premolar teeth: an attempt to correlate working length measured with electronic and radiograph methods to various anatomic positions in the apical portion of the canal.
Hassanien EE; Hashem A; Chalfin H
J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 18358885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of Root ZX II in locating foramen in teeth with apical periodontitis: an in vivo study.
Piasecki L; Carneiro E; Fariniuk LF; Westphalen VP; Fiorentin MA; da Silva Neto UX
J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1213-6. PubMed ID: 21846536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of apex locator.
Vajrabhaya L; Tepmongkol P
Endod Dent Traumatol; 1997 Aug; 13(4):180-2. PubMed ID: 9550044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo determination of root canal length: a preliminary report using the Tri Auto ZX apex-locating handpiece.
Grimberg F; Banegas G; Chiacchio L; Zmener O
Int Endod J; 2002 Jul; 35(7):590-3. PubMed ID: 12190898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accuracy of root canal measurements using the Mini Apex Locator and Root ZX-II: an evaluation in vitro.
D'Assunção FL; de Albuquerque DS; Salazar-Silva JR; de Queiroz Ferreira LC; Bezerra PM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):e50-3. PubMed ID: 17709069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The accuracy of electronic working length determination.
Hoer D; Attin T
Int Endod J; 2004 Feb; 37(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 14871179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of precision of length determination with 3 electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator, and RomiAPEX D-30.
Bernardes RA; Duarte MA; Vasconcelos BC; Moraes IG; Bernardineli N; Garcia RB; Baldi JV; Victorino FR; Bramante CM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):e91-4. PubMed ID: 17703968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of periapical radiographic techniques with apex locator for endodontic working length estimation: an ex vivo study.
Parekh V; Taluja C
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 22186757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of pulp condition on the accuracy of an electronic foramen locator in posterior teeth: an in vivo study.
Renner D; Grazziotin-Soares R; Gavini G; Barletta FB
Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 22473344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [In vitro comparison of an electronic root canal length measuring device and the radiographic determination of working length].
Pommer O
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2001; 111(10):1165-70. PubMed ID: 11729819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The evaluation of the ability of Apex D.S.P. to determine the length of root canal. In vitro study].
Lewińska E; Lipski M; Marciniak-Paradowska M; Woźniak K; Lichota D
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 19374229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of radiographic and electronical working length determination on palatal and mesio-buccal root canals of extracted upper molars.
Krajczár K; Marada G; Gyulai G; Tóth V
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):e90-3. PubMed ID: 18554958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
