BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16793475)

  • 1. Comparison of the intraosseous biocompatibility of AH Plus, EndoREZ, and Epiphany root canal sealers.
    Sousa CJ; Montes CR; Pascon EA; Loyola AM; Versiani MA
    J Endod; 2006 Jul; 32(7):656-62. PubMed ID: 16793475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toxicity evaluation of root canal sealers in vitro.
    Lodiene G; Morisbak E; Bruzell E; Ørstavik D
    Int Endod J; 2008 Jan; 41(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 17931390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo comparison of the biocompatibility of two root canal sealers implanted into the subcutaneous connective tissue of rats.
    Zafalon EJ; Versiani MA; de Souza CJ; Moura CC; Dechichi P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):e88-94. PubMed ID: 17320427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative histological evaluation of the biocompatibility of materials used in apical surgery.
    Sousa CJ; Loyola AM; Versiani MA; Biffi JC; Oliveira RP; Pascon EA
    Int Endod J; 2004 Nov; 37(11):738-48. PubMed ID: 15479256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of tissue reactions to methacrylate resin-based, epoxy resin-based, and zinc oxide-eugenol endodontic sealers.
    Scarparo RK; Grecca FS; Fachin EV
    J Endod; 2009 Feb; 35(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 19166779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cytotoxicity evaluation of various resin based root canal sealers.
    Al-Hiyasat AS; Tayyar M; Darmani H
    Int Endod J; 2010 Feb; 43(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 20078704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Setting time affects in vitro biological properties of root canal sealers.
    Camargo CH; Oliveira TR; Silva GO; Rabelo SB; Valera MC; Cavalcanti BN
    J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):530-3. PubMed ID: 24666905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of calcium hydroxide addition to AH Plus sealer on its biocompatibility.
    de Oliveira RL; Oliveira Filho RS; Gomes Hde C; de Franco MF; Enokihara MM; Duarte MA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e50-4. PubMed ID: 20123371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the biocompatibility of Epiphany root canal sealer in rat subcutaneous tissues.
    de Campos-Pinto MM; de Oliveira DA; Versiani MA; Silva-Sousa YT; de Sousa-Neto MD; da Cruz Perez DE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 May; 105(5):e77-81. PubMed ID: 18442740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of various root filling systems by glucose filtration analysis.
    Karapinar-Kazandağ M; Tanalp J; Bayrak OF; Sunay H; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):e96-102. PubMed ID: 20417137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cytotoxicity of 5 endodontic sealers on L929 cell line and human dental pulp cells.
    Karapınar-Kazandağ M; Bayrak OF; Yalvaç ME; Ersev H; Tanalp J; Sahin F; Bayırlı G
    Int Endod J; 2011 Jul; 44(7):626-34. PubMed ID: 21306404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term cytotoxic effects of contemporary root canal sealers.
    Silva EJ; Santos CC; Zaia AA
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2013; 21(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 23559111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Solubility of root canal sealers with different organic solvents.
    Bodrumlu E; Er O; Kayaoglu G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e67-9. PubMed ID: 18602299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Push-out bond strengths: the Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha.
    Ungor M; Onay EO; Orucoglu H
    Int Endod J; 2006 Aug; 39(8):643-7. PubMed ID: 16872459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy and flow properties for Epiphany, Guttaflow and AH-Plus sealer.
    Nawal RR; Parande M; Sehgal R; Naik A; Rao NR
    Int Endod J; 2011 Apr; 44(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 21219358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the intraosseous biocompatibility of Dyract and Super EBA.
    Pertot WJ; Stephan G; Tardieu C; Proust JP
    J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):315-9. PubMed ID: 9545935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histopathologic evaluation of subcutaneous tissue response to three endodontic sealers in rats.
    Farhad AR; Hasheminia S; Razavi S; Feizi M
    J Oral Sci; 2011 Mar; 53(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 21467810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bond strength of AH Plus and Epiphany sealers on root dentine irradiated with 980 nm diode laser.
    Alfredo E; Silva SR; Ozório JE; Sousa-Neto MD; Brugnera-Júnior A; Silva-Sousa YT
    Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):733-40. PubMed ID: 18798921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-term cytotoxicity assessment of components of the epiphany resin-percha obturating system by indirect and direct contact millipore filter assays.
    Merdad K; Pascon AE; Kulkarni G; Santerre P; Friedman S
    J Endod; 2007 Jan; 33(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 17185123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The apical sealing ability of a new root canal filling material.
    Bodrumlu E; Tunga U
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):295-8. PubMed ID: 17993025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.