These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1679509)
1. Audible in-utero sound from ultrasound scanner. Arulkumaran S; Talbert DG; Nyman M; Westgren M; Hsu TS; Ratnam SS Lancet; 1991 Sep; 338(8768):704-5. PubMed ID: 1679509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Audible in utero sound caused by the ultrasonic radiation force from a real-time scanner. Arulkumaran S; Talbert DG; Nyman M; Westgren M; Su HT; Ratnam SS J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1996 Dec; 22(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 9037941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method for controlled sound stimulation of the human fetus. Jensen OH; Flottorp G Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 7178814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Letter: Letter: Determination of the transfer function of the external ear by an impulse response measurement. Mellert V; Siebrasse KF; Mehrgardt S J Acoust Soc Am; 1974 Dec; 56(6):1913-5. PubMed ID: 4443492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Possible use of acoustic stimulation in the evaluation of fetal condition]. Samodurov PS; Khapova LM Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1990 May; (5):15-9. PubMed ID: 2204285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling and estimating acoustic transfer functions of external ears with or without headphones. Deng H; Yang J J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):694-707. PubMed ID: 26328687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The click-evoked postauricular response and its clinical application (author's transl)]. Okudaira T Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1977 Sep; 80(9):889-901. PubMed ID: 597356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ear deformations give bats a physical mechanism for fast adaptation of ultrasonic beam patterns. Gao L; Balakrishnan S; He W; Yan Z; Müller R Phys Rev Lett; 2011 Nov; 107(21):214301. PubMed ID: 22181884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Auditory perception and fetal reaction to react to sound stimulation (author's transl)]. Querleu D; Renard X; Crépin G J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1981; 10(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 7299095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of ultrasound for monitoring foetal breathing movements. Farman KJ; Thomas G Biomed Eng; 1975 May; 10(5):172-4. PubMed ID: 1125360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics of the audio sound generated by ultrasound imaging systems. Fatemi M; Alizad A; Greenleaf JF J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1448-55. PubMed ID: 15807032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectral cues used in the localization of sound sources on the median plane. Hebrank J; Wright D J Acoust Soc Am; 1974 Dec; 56(6):1829-34. PubMed ID: 4443482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The acoustic properties of the infant ear. A preliminary report. Kruger B; Ruben RJ Acta Otolaryngol; 1987; 103(5-6):578-85. PubMed ID: 3618184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Directionality of sound perception in the external ear of the dog]. Gorlinskiĭ IA; Babushina ES Biofizika; 1985; 30(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 3978135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Obstetrical ultrasound: can the fetus hear the wave and feel the heat?]. Abramowicz JS; Kremkau FW; Merz E Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 22700164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Sound sensations produced by electric stimulation of the structures of the middle ear and the tympanic chord]. Michel J; Verain A Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1975; 92(1-2):33-60. PubMed ID: 766693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transformation function of the external ear in response to impulsive stimulation. Price GR J Acoust Soc Am; 1974 Jul; 56(1):190-4. PubMed ID: 4605399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Short-latency auditory evoked potentials at the retroauricular region]. Yajima K; Konno K; Sobue H; Nakai O; Seino O No To Shinkei; 1972 Jan; 24(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 4333594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]