These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16795391)

  • 1. Reviewers' comment.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1973; 6(1):186. PubMed ID: 16795391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reviewers' Responses to Medical Research Articles.
    Sohail S; Akhtar J
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2019 Jan; 29(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 30630565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.
    Snell L; Spencer J
    Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 15612905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responding to reviewers' comments as part of writing for publication.
    Happell B
    Nurse Res; 2011; 18(4):23-7. PubMed ID: 21853889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of institutional prestige on reviewers' recommendations and editorial decisions.
    Garfunkel JM; Ulshen MH; Hamrick HJ; Lawson EE
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):137-8. PubMed ID: 8015125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reviewers' comments.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1973; 6(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 16795437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger".
    Vinther S; Nielsen OH; Rosenberg J; Keiding N; Schroeder TV
    Dan Med J; 2012 Aug; 59(8):A4479. PubMed ID: 22849979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dealing with conflicting reviewers' comments.
    Johnson SH
    Nurse Author Ed; 1996; 6(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 8868722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between methodological quality and conclusions in reviews of spinal manipulation.
    Assendelft WJ; Koes BW; Knipschild PG; Bouter LM
    JAMA; 1995 Dec; 274(24):1942-8. PubMed ID: 8568990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gender factors in reviewer recommendations for manuscript publication.
    Lloyd ME
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 16795738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of reviewers' gender on assessments of a gender-related standardized manuscript.
    Caelleigh AS; Hojat M; Steinecke A; Gonnella JS
    Teach Learn Med; 2003; 15(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 12855386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of reviewers' clinical backgrounds on interpretation of confocal laser endomicroscopy findings.
    Kobayashi M; Neumann H; Hino S; Vieth M; Abe S; Nakai Y; Nakajima K; Kiesslich R; Hirooka S; Sumiyama K
    Endoscopy; 2016 Jun; 48(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 26862845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A peek behind the curtain: peer review and editorial decision making at Stroke.
    Sposato LA; Ovbiagele B; Johnston SC; Fisher M; Saposnik G;
    Ann Neurol; 2014 Aug; 76(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 25043350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reviewing a Manuscript: Disparity Amongst Peer Reviewers' Priorities from Basic Health Sciences and Clinicians.
    Baig S; Ahmed S; Attique H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Aug; 26(8):677-80. PubMed ID: 27539762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reviewers' comments on Timberlake's "Behavior regulation and learned performance".
    Hursh SR; Case D; Mazur JE; Fantino E; Branch M; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 May; 41(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 16812375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reviewers' comments.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1973; 6(1):165-6. PubMed ID: 16795387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current behavior modification in the classroom: reviewers' comments.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1972; 5(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 16795375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reviewers' comments.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1974; 7(3):495-6. PubMed ID: 16795474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reviewers' comments.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1972; 5(3):376-8. PubMed ID: 16795360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technology and ecology: Reviewers' comments.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1974; 7(1):169-70. PubMed ID: 16795463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.