These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16795463)

  • 41. When your manuscript is rejected.
    Gay JT; Edgil AE
    Nurs Health Care; 1989 Oct; 10(8):459-61. PubMed ID: 2797504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A peek behind the curtain: peer review and editorial decision making at Stroke.
    Sposato LA; Ovbiagele B; Johnston SC; Fisher M; Saposnik G;
    Ann Neurol; 2014 Aug; 76(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 25043350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reviewing a Manuscript: Disparity Amongst Peer Reviewers' Priorities from Basic Health Sciences and Clinicians.
    Baig S; Ahmed S; Attique H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Aug; 26(8):677-80. PubMed ID: 27539762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reviewers' comment.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1973; 6(1):186. PubMed ID: 16795391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reviewers' role in improving manuscripts.
    Hopefl A
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2001 May; 58(10):915. PubMed ID: 11455936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Full recognition of voluntary reviewers' exemplary dedication.
    Park JB
    J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2019 Aug; 49(4):205. PubMed ID: 31485370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Gatekeepers and Consultants: The Reviewers' Roles.
    Cowell JM
    J Sch Nurs; 2016 Dec; 32(6):384. PubMed ID: 27803380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Should reviewers' names be included at the end of journal papers?
    Stensel D
    J Sports Sci; 2005 May; 23(5):447. PubMed ID: 16194992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Recognizing Our Experts:
    Wiechert K; Chapman JR; Wang JC
    Global Spine J; 2018 May; 8(3):217. PubMed ID: 29796367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Are Reviewers' Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports.
    Schriger DL; Kadera SP; von Elm E
    Ann Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 67(3):401-406.e6. PubMed ID: 26518378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Alphabetic bias in the selection of reviewers for the American Journal of Roentgenology.
    Richardson ML
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):W213-6. PubMed ID: 19020207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reviewers' Role in Research.
    Zareen N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 Jul; 27(7):456. PubMed ID: 28818174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantitative analysis of verbal expressions in comments from evaluation committee reviewers in AIST between fiscal years 2001 and 2008.
    Yamamoto T
    Eval Rev; 2010 Oct; 34(5):419-35. PubMed ID: 20826489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The current generation of research proposals: reviewers' viewpoints.
    Kim MJ; Felton G
    Nurs Res; 1993; 42(2):118-9. PubMed ID: 8455987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Peer review of statistics in medical research. Reviewers' contributions should be thoughtful, constructive, and encouraging.
    Barton GA
    BMJ; 2002 Aug; 325(7362):491. PubMed ID: 12211231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Can we rely on patients' reports of adverse events?
    Zhu J; Stuver SO; Epstein AM; Schneider EC; Weissman JS; Weingart SN
    Med Care; 2011 Oct; 49(10):948-55. PubMed ID: 21642876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process.
    Vercellini P; Buggio L; Viganò P; Somigliana E
    Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 31():15-9. PubMed ID: 27129625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Author and Reviewers' Needless Conflict.
    Kadam D
    Indian J Plast Surg; 2023 Apr; 56(2):97-98. PubMed ID: 37153334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reviewers' list December 2017.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2017 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 28986098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Transparent peer review--an appreciation of the reviewers' contribution to a published article.
    Linder S; Schliwa M; Werner S; Gebauer D
    Eur J Cell Biol; 2010 Nov; 89(11):779. PubMed ID: 20813427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.