These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16795480)

  • 1. A brief report on a comparison of time-sampling procedures.
    Thomson C
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1974; 7(4):623-6. PubMed ID: 16795480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partial report and other sampling procedures overestimate the duration of iconic memory.
    Appelman IB
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Mar; 93(1):79-97. PubMed ID: 7396049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to improve the performances of Fecal Immunological Tests (FIT): Need for standardization of the sampling and pre-analytical phases and revision of the procedures for comparison of methods.
    Rapi S; Rubeca T; Fraser CG
    Int J Biol Markers; 2015 Feb; 30(1):e127-31. PubMed ID: 24855037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of anesthesia and blood sampling techniques on plasma metabolites and corticosterone in the rat.
    Arnold M; Langhans W
    Physiol Behav; 2010 Apr; 99(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 20152845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of sequential versus simultaneous methods of adrenal venous sampling.
    Carr CE; Cope C; Cohen DL; Fraker DL; Trerotola SO
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1245-50. PubMed ID: 15525743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized comparison of transcervical and transabdominal chorionic-villus sampling. The U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Chorionic-Villus Sampling and Amniocentesis Study Group.
    Jackson LG; Zachary JM; Fowler SE; Desnick RJ; Golbus MS; Ledbetter DH; Mahoney MJ; Pergament E; Simpson JL; Black S
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):594-8. PubMed ID: 1640952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal loss following invasive prenatal testing: a comparison of transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, transcervical chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis.
    Niederstrasser SL; Hammer K; Möllers M; Falkenberg MK; Schmidt R; Steinhard J; Klockenbusch W; Schmitz R
    J Perinat Med; 2017 Feb; 45(2):193-198. PubMed ID: 27416616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Randomized comparison of transabdominal, transcervical chorionic villi sampling and amniocentesis].
    Smidt-Jensen SL; Permin M; Philip J; Lundsteen C; Grüning LK; Zachary JM; Fowler SE
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 May; 155(19):1446-56. PubMed ID: 8316971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recruiting injection drug users: a three-site comparison of results and experiences with respondent-driven and targeted sampling procedures.
    Robinson WT; Risser JM; McGoy S; Becker AB; Rehman H; Jefferson M; Griffin V; Wolverton M; Tortu S
    J Urban Health; 2006 Nov; 83(6 Suppl):i29-38. PubMed ID: 16933101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Second-order schedules: a comparison of chained, brief-stimulus, and tandem procedures.
    Malagodi EF; Deweese J; Johnston JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Nov; 20(3):447-60. PubMed ID: 16811717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematical evaluation of the effects of sample collection procedures on low-molecular-weight serum/plasma proteome profiling.
    Hsieh SY; Chen RK; Pan YH; Lee HL
    Proteomics; 2006 May; 6(10):3189-98. PubMed ID: 16586434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brief school-based interventions and behavioural outcomes for substance-using adolescents.
    Carney T; Myers BJ; Louw J; Okwundu CI
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; (2):CD008969. PubMed ID: 24563456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of temporal and location-based sampling strategies for global positioning system-triggered electronic diaries.
    Törnros T; Dorn H; Reichert M; Ebner-Priemer U; Salize HJ; Tost H; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Zipf A
    Geospat Health; 2016 Nov; 11(3):473. PubMed ID: 27903053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of procedures for sampling contaminated soil using Gy's Sampling Theory and Practice.
    Boudreault JP; Dubé JS; Sona M; Hardy E
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 May; 425():199-207. PubMed ID: 22482784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Second-order schedules: comparison of different procedures for scheduling paired and nonpaired brief stimuli.
    Stubbs DA; Cohen SL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Nov; 18(3):403-13. PubMed ID: 16811634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of instantaneous and locomotor bout sampling methods: a case study of adult male chimpanzee locomotor behavior and substrate use.
    Doran DM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1992 Sep; 89(1):85-99. PubMed ID: 1530064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sampling minority groups in health surveys.
    Kalsbeek WD
    Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1527-49. PubMed ID: 12704614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intermethod comparisons of active sampling procedures and analysis of aldehydes at environmental levels.
    Huynh CK; Vu-Duc T
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2002 Mar; 372(5-6):654-7. PubMed ID: 11941435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sampling procedures and survey methodologies for the 1996 survey with comparisons to earlier national roadside surveys.
    Lestina DC; Greene M; Voas RB; Wells J
    Eval Rev; 1999 Feb; 23(1):28-46. PubMed ID: 10346071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Methodology of renal vein renin study: comparison between simultaneous and sequential sampling (author's transl)].
    Glorioso N; Dessi Fulgheri P; Madeddu P; Fois G; Lenguini L; Cocco FG; Rappelli A
    G Ital Cardiol; 1980; 10(9):1186-91. PubMed ID: 7007141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.