These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16795792)

  • 1. Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings.
    Neef NA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(3):691-9. PubMed ID: 16795792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality.
    Neef NA; Mace FC; Shade D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 8473257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of problem difficulty and reinforcer quality on time allocated to concurrent arithmetic problems.
    Mace FC; Neef NA; Shade D; Mauro BC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 8881341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limited matching on concurrent-schedule reinforcement of academic behavior.
    Mace FC; Neef NA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(4):585-96. PubMed ID: 16795839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.
    Alsop B; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 16812530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Residence time and choice in concurrent foraging schedules.
    Jones BM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Mar; 65(2):423-44. PubMed ID: 16812805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Signaled reinforcement: Effects of signal reliability on choice between signaled and unsignaled alternatives.
    Gomes-Ng S; Macababbad AC; Bai JYH; Baharrizki D; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2020 May; 174():104088. PubMed ID: 32092454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concurrent choice: Effects of overall reinforcer rate and the temporal distribution of reinforcers.
    Elliffe D; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Mar; 65(2):445-63. PubMed ID: 16812806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?
    Grace RC; Bragason O
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Mar; 83(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15828593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on changeover behaviour in concurrent schedules of reinforcement.
    Al-Ruwaitea AS; Chiang TJ; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Jun; 144(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 10435393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 May; 79(3):351-65. PubMed ID: 12908762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intravenous self-administration of cocaine under concurrent VI schedules of reinforcement.
    Woolverton WL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1996 Oct; 127(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 8912397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 25515591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance.
    Neef NA; Shade D; Miller MS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(4):575-83. PubMed ID: 7844054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concurrent variable-interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations.
    Davison M; Hogsden I
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Mar; 41(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 16812365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 14964707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.