BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16797427)

  • 1. A comparison of anesthesiology resident and faculty electronic evaluations before and after implementation of automated electronic reminders.
    Blum JM; Kheterpal S; Tremper KK
    J Clin Anesth; 2006 Jun; 18(4):264-7. PubMed ID: 16797427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of faculty-specific electronic reminders on faculty compliance with daily resident evaluations: a retrospective study.
    Rusa R; Klatil F; Fu R; Swide CE
    J Clin Anesth; 2009 May; 21(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 19464607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient, faculty, and self-assessment of radiology resident performance: a 360-degree method of measuring professionalism and interpersonal/communication skills.
    Wood J; Collins J; Burnside ES; Albanese MA; Propeck PA; Kelcz F; Spilde JM; Schmaltz LM
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):931-9. PubMed ID: 15288041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resident evaluations: the use of daily evaluation forms in rheumatology ambulatory care.
    Humphrey-Murto S; Khalidi N; Smith CD; Kaminska E; Touchie C; Keely E; Wood TJ
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1298-303. PubMed ID: 19332624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anesthesiology resident personality type correlates with faculty assessment of resident performance.
    Schell RM; Dilorenzo AN; Li HF; Fragneto RY; Bowe EA; Hessel EA
    J Clin Anesth; 2012 Nov; 24(7):566-72. PubMed ID: 23101772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An instrument designed for faculty supervision evaluation by anesthesia residents and its psychometric properties.
    de Oliveira Filho GR; Dal Mago AJ; Garcia JH; Goldschmidt R
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Oct; 107(4):1316-22. PubMed ID: 18806047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ongoing faculty evaluations: developmental gain or just more pain?
    Maker VK; Lewis MJ; Donnelly MB
    Curr Surg; 2006; 63(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 16373168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can a computerized tracking system improve faculty compliance with medical student evaluations?
    Manthey D; Magilner DI; Ozumba A; Neiberg RH
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(8):778-80. PubMed ID: 18946822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing and documenting general competencies in otolaryngology resident training programs.
    Roark RM; Schaefer SD; Yu GP; Branovan DI; Peterson SJ; Lee WN
    Laryngoscope; 2006 May; 116(5):682-95. PubMed ID: 16652072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing resident competency in an outpatient setting.
    Wendling AL
    Fam Med; 2004 Mar; 36(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 14999574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are the communication and professionalism competencies the new critical values in a resident's global evaluation process?
    Haurani MJ; Rubinfeld I; Rao S; Beaubien J; Musial JL; Parker A; Reickert C; Raafat A; Shepard A
    J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):351-6. PubMed ID: 18063268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Faculty evaluations: diagnostic and therapeutic.
    Maker VK; Curtis KD; Donnelly MB
    Curr Surg; 2004; 61(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 15590033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-institutional validation of a web-based core competency assessment system.
    Tabuenca A; Welling R; Sachdeva AK; Blair PG; Horvath K; Tarpley J; Savino JA; Gray R; Gulley J; Arnold T; Wolfe K; Risucci DA
    J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):390-4. PubMed ID: 18063275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resident and faculty differences in student evaluations: implications for changes in a clerkship grading system.
    Carline JD; Cook CE; Lennard ES; Siever M; Coluccio GM; Norman NL
    Surgery; 1986 Jul; 100(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 3726766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Internet-based evaluation system for a surgical residency program.
    D'Cunha J; Larson CE; Maddaus MA; Landis GH
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jun; 196(6):905-10. PubMed ID: 12788427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Knowledge base evaluation of medicine residents on the gastroenterology service: Implications for competency assessments by faculty.
    Kolars JC; McDonald FS; Subhiyah RG; Edson RS
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2003 Jan; 1(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15017519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of a faculty evaluated scoring system for anesthesiology resident applicants (Original Investigation).
    Gumbert SD; Normand KC; Artime CA; Nwokolo OO; Williams G; Guzman-Reyes S; Ghebremichael S; Sridhar S; Graham-Carlson AD; Pawelek O; Jain R; Hagberg CA; Pivalizza EG
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():131-6. PubMed ID: 27185695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty.
    Akl EA; Maroun N; Klocke RA; Montori V; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 15862729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Missed opportunities: a descriptive assessment of teaching and attitudes regarding communication skills in a surgical residency.
    Hutul OA; Carpenter RO; Tarpley JL; Lomis KD
    Curr Surg; 2006; 63(6):401-9. PubMed ID: 17084769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of interns by senior residents and faculty: is there any difference?
    Ringdahl EN; Delzell JE; Kruse RL
    Med Educ; 2004 Jun; 38(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 15189261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.