251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16797826)
1. Improved cervical cancer screening in premenopausal women by combination of Pap smear and speculoscopy.
Twu NF; Chen YJ; Wang PH; Yu BK; Lai CR; Chao KC; Yuan CC; Yen MS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jul; 133(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 16797826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evaluation of cervical cancer screening by combining speculoscopy with Papanicolaou smear examination in Taiwan.
Chang JI; Ou CH; Wu KM; Chen CC; Cheng KC
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2002 Sep; 65(9):430-4. PubMed ID: 12433029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening of cervical neoplasia by using pap smear with speculoscopy compared with pap smear alone.
Boonlikit S; Supakarapongkul W; Preuksaritanond N; Vipupinyo C; Tuipae S; Mangclaviras S; Karnplumjid S; Chantarawiroj P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 15962661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved early detection of cervical intraepithelial lesions by combination of conventional Pap smear and speculoscopy.
Yu BK; Kuo BI; Yen MS; Twu NF; Lai CR; Chen PJ; Chien PS; Chao KC; Yuan CC
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(6):495-9. PubMed ID: 14658588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ability of visual tests to predict underlying cervical neoplasia. Colposcopy and speculoscopy.
Lonky NM; Mann WJ; Massad LS; Mutch DG; Blanco JS; Vasilev SA; Finan MA; Scotti RJ
J Reprod Med; 1995 Jul; 40(7):530-6. PubMed ID: 7473444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Lugol's iodine (VILI), cervical cytology and HPV testing as cervical screening tools in Latin America. This report refers to partial results from the LAMS (Latin AMerican Screening) study.
Sarian LO; Derchain SF; Naud P; Roteli-Martins C; Longatto-Filho A; Tatti S; Branca M; Erzen M; Serpa-Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Bragança JF; Lima TP; Maeda MY; Lörincz A; Dores GB; Costa S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 16156945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of visual inspection of cervix and Pap smear for cervical cancer screening.
Tayyeb R; Khawaja NP; Malik N
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Apr; 13(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 12718787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women.
Del Priore G; Maag T; Bhattacharya M; Garcia PM; Till M; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 7705674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of speculoscopy in the evaluation of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears. Improved cost effectiveness by selective colposcopy.
Massad LS; Lonky NM; Mutch DG; Mann WJ; Blanco JS; Vasilev SA; Finan MA; Scotti RJ
J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar; 38(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 8387595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid in cervical cancer screening: a comparison with cervical cytology.
Akinola OI; Fabamwo AO; Oshodi YA; Banjo AA; Odusanya O; Gbadegesin A; Tayo A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 27(7):703-5. PubMed ID: 17999297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improvement of Pap smear sensitivity using a visual adjunctive procedure: a co-operative Italian study on speculoscopy (GISPE).
Loiudice L; Abbiati R; Boselli F; Cecchini G; Costa S; Grossi E; Piccoli R; Villani C
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1998 Aug; 7(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 9806118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for cervical disease in mature women: strategies for improvement.
Colgan TJ; Clarke A; Hakh N; Seidenfeld A
Cancer; 2002 Aug; 96(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 12209660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).
Walker JL; Wang SS; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 16890545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervicography: adjunctive cervical cancer screening by primary care clinicians.
Ferris DG; Payne P; Frisch LE; Milner FH; diPaola FM; Petry LJ
J Fam Pract; 1993 Aug; 37(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 8336097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of visual inspection and Papanicolau (PAP) smears for cervical cancer screening in Honduras: should PAP smears be abandoned?
Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Figueroa J; Simon CJ
Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Sep; 12(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 17875013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of p16INK4a in cervical lesion of premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Bolanca IK; Ciglar S
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():107-11. PubMed ID: 17600938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of repeat Pap smear at the time of initial colposcopy.
Spitzer M; Ryskin M; Chernys AE; Shifrin A
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9345348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A 1-year experience with liquid-based and conventional papanicolaou smear in Thammasat University Hospital.
Suwannarurk K; Bhamarapravatana K; Thaweekul Y; Mairaing K; Poomtavorn Y; Pattaraarchachai J
J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Dec; 94 Suppl 7():S47-51. PubMed ID: 22619906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
