465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16797879)
1. Large-scale analyses of synonymous substitution rates can be sensitive to assumptions about the process of mutation.
Aris-Brosou S; Bielawski JP
Gene; 2006 Aug; 378():58-64. PubMed ID: 16797879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mutation-selection models of codon substitution and their use to estimate selective strengths on codon usage.
Yang Z; Nielsen R
Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 18178545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic robustness and selection at the protein level for synonymous codons.
Archetti M
J Evol Biol; 2006 Mar; 19(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 16599911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selective pressures at a codon-level predict deleterious mutations in human disease genes.
Arbiza L; Duchi S; Montaner D; Burguet J; Pantoja-Uceda D; Pineda-Lucena A; Dopazo J; Dopazo H
J Mol Biol; 2006 May; 358(5):1390-404. PubMed ID: 16584746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An empirical codon model for protein sequence evolution.
Kosiol C; Holmes I; Goldman N
Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jul; 24(7):1464-79. PubMed ID: 17400572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards realistic codon models: among site variability and dependency of synonymous and non-synonymous rates.
Mayrose I; Doron-Faigenboim A; Bacharach E; Pupko T
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i319-27. PubMed ID: 17646313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Site-to-site variation of synonymous substitution rates.
Pond SK; Muse SV
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2375-85. PubMed ID: 16107593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variation in synonymous codon use and DNA polymorphism within the Drosophila genome.
Bierne N; Eyre-Walker A
J Evol Biol; 2006 Jan; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16405571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A combined empirical and mechanistic codon model.
Doron-Faigenboim A; Pupko T
Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Feb; 24(2):388-97. PubMed ID: 17110464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila.
Comeron JM; Guthrie TB
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2519-30. PubMed ID: 16120803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolutionary genomics: codon volatility does not detect selection.
Chen Y; Emerson JJ; Martin TM
Nature; 2005 Jan; 433(7023):E6-7; discussion E7-8. PubMed ID: 15662371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA sequence evolution: the sounds of silence.
Sharp PM; Averof M; Lloyd AT; Matassi G; Peden JF
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1995 Sep; 349(1329):241-7. PubMed ID: 8577834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why are translationally sub-optimal synonymous codons used in Escherichia coli?
Smith NG; Eyre-Walker A
J Mol Evol; 2001 Sep; 53(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 11523009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selection intensity on preferred codons correlates with overall codon usage bias in Caenorhabditis remanei.
Cutter AD; Charlesworth B
Curr Biol; 2006 Oct; 16(20):2053-7. PubMed ID: 17055986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The molecular clock revisited: the rate of synonymous vs. replacement change in Drosophila.
Zeng LW; Comeron JM; Chen B; Kreitman M
Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):369-82. PubMed ID: 9720289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of strong directional selection on weakly selected mutations at linked sites: implication for synonymous codon usage.
Kim Y
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Feb; 21(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 14660698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computing Ka and Ks with a consideration of unequal transitional substitutions.
Zhang Z; Li J; Yu J
BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Jun; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16740169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Synonymous substitutions substantially improve evolutionary inference from highly diverged proteins.
Seo TK; Kishino H
Syst Biol; 2008 Jun; 57(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 18570032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive selection at sites of multiple amino acid replacements since rat-mouse divergence.
Bazykin GA; Kondrashov FA; Ogurtsov AY; Sunyaev S; Kondrashov AS
Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):558-62. PubMed ID: 15175752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions.
Tzeng YH; Pan R; Li WH
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Dec; 21(12):2290-8. PubMed ID: 15329386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
