These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16798417)

  • 1. Reporting and analyzing statistical uncertainties in Monte Carlo-based treatment planning.
    Chetty IJ; Rosu M; Kessler ML; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK; Kong FM; McShan DL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(4):1249-59. PubMed ID: 16798417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of four-dimensional (4D) Monte Carlo dose calculation in real-time tumor tracking stereotatic body radiotherapy for lung cancers.
    Chan MK; Kwong DL; Ng SC; Tam EK; Tong AS
    Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5479-87. PubMed ID: 22957615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective monte carlo dose calculations with limited beam weight information.
    Lindsay PE; El Naqa I; Hope AJ; Vicic M; Cui J; Bradley JD; Deasy JO
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):334-46. PubMed ID: 17278519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dealing with geometric uncertainties in dose painting by numbers: introducing the ΔVH.
    Witte M; Shakirin G; Houweling A; Peulen H; van Herk M
    Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):402-6. PubMed ID: 21937139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I; Ahmad S
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical assessment of proton treatment plans under setup and range uncertainties.
    Park PC; Cheung JP; Zhu XR; Lee AK; Sahoo N; Tucker SL; Liu W; Li H; Mohan R; Court LE; Dong L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Aug; 86(5):1007-13. PubMed ID: 23688812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of uncertainty-based stopping criteria for monte carlo calculations of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and arc therapy patient dose distributions.
    Vanderstraeten B; Olteanu AM; Reynaert N; Leal A; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):628-37. PubMed ID: 17869677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of dose calculation uncertainty on the evaluation of radiotherapy plans.
    Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Jeraj R; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 10757600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of X-ray voxel Monte Carlo versus pencil beam-based dose calculation in stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer under normal and deep inspiration breath hold.
    Landoni V; Borzì GR; Strolin S; Bruzzaniti V; Soriani A; D'Alessio D; Ambesi F; Di Grazia AM; Strigari L
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jun; 14(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 25223324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of the optimal statistical uncertainty to perform electron-beam Monte Carlo absorbed dose estimation in the target volume.
    Isambert A; Brualla L; Benkebil M; Lefkopoulos D
    Cancer Radiother; 2010 Apr; 14(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20061172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EUD-based radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation: incorporating physical and Monte Carlo statistical dose uncertainties.
    Cranmer-Sargison G; Zavgorodni S
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16177533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How extensive of a 4D dataset is needed to estimate cumulative dose distribution plan evaluation metrics in conformal lung therapy?
    Rosu M; Balter JM; Chetty IJ; Kessler ML; McShan DL; Balter P; Ten Haken RK
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):233-45. PubMed ID: 17278509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncertainties in planned dose due to the limited voxel size of the planning CT when treating lung tumors with proton therapy.
    España S; Paganetti H
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(13):3843-56. PubMed ID: 21628773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo-based lung cancer treatment planning incorporating PET-defined target volumes.
    Chetty IJ; Fernando S; Kessler ML; McShan DL; Brooks C; Ten Haken RK; Kong FM
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(4):65-76. PubMed ID: 16421501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of Monte Carlo statistical uncertainties on the evaluation of dose distributions in radiation treatment planning.
    Kawrakow I
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(8):1549-56. PubMed ID: 15152691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the influence of setup uncertainties on treatment planning for focal liver tumors.
    Balter JM; Brock KK; Lam KL; Tatro D; Dawson LA; McShan DL; Ten Haken RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):610-4. PubMed ID: 16095848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased therapeutic ratio by 18FDG-PET CT planning in patients with clinical CT stage N2-N3M0 non-small-cell lung cancer: a modeling study.
    van Der Wel A; Nijsten S; Hochstenbag M; Lamers R; Boersma L; Wanders R; Lutgens L; Zimny M; Bentzen SM; Wouters B; Lambin P; De Ruysscher D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):649-55. PubMed ID: 15708242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo evaluation of RapidArc oropharynx treatment planning strategies for sparing of midline structures.
    Bush K; Zavgorodni S; Gagne I; Townson R; Ansbacher W; Beckham W
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4465-79. PubMed ID: 20668338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
    Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical Note: Monte Carlo methods to comprehensively evaluate the robustness of 4D treatments in proton therapy.
    Souris K; Barragan Montero A; Janssens G; Di Perri D; Sterpin E; Lee JA
    Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4676-4684. PubMed ID: 31376305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.