208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16798417)
1. Reporting and analyzing statistical uncertainties in Monte Carlo-based treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; Kessler ML; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK; Kong FM; McShan DL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(4):1249-59. PubMed ID: 16798417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of four-dimensional (4D) Monte Carlo dose calculation in real-time tumor tracking stereotatic body radiotherapy for lung cancers.
Chan MK; Kwong DL; Ng SC; Tam EK; Tong AS
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5479-87. PubMed ID: 22957615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrospective monte carlo dose calculations with limited beam weight information.
Lindsay PE; El Naqa I; Hope AJ; Vicic M; Cui J; Bradley JD; Deasy JO
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):334-46. PubMed ID: 17278519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dealing with geometric uncertainties in dose painting by numbers: introducing the ΔVH.
Witte M; Shakirin G; Houweling A; Peulen H; van Herk M
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):402-6. PubMed ID: 21937139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical assessment of proton treatment plans under setup and range uncertainties.
Park PC; Cheung JP; Zhu XR; Lee AK; Sahoo N; Tucker SL; Liu W; Li H; Mohan R; Court LE; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Aug; 86(5):1007-13. PubMed ID: 23688812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of uncertainty-based stopping criteria for monte carlo calculations of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and arc therapy patient dose distributions.
Vanderstraeten B; Olteanu AM; Reynaert N; Leal A; De Neve W; Thierens H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):628-37. PubMed ID: 17869677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of dose calculation uncertainty on the evaluation of radiotherapy plans.
Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Jeraj R; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 10757600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of X-ray voxel Monte Carlo versus pencil beam-based dose calculation in stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer under normal and deep inspiration breath hold.
Landoni V; Borzì GR; Strolin S; Bruzzaniti V; Soriani A; D'Alessio D; Ambesi F; Di Grazia AM; Strigari L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jun; 14(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 25223324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of the optimal statistical uncertainty to perform electron-beam Monte Carlo absorbed dose estimation in the target volume.
Isambert A; Brualla L; Benkebil M; Lefkopoulos D
Cancer Radiother; 2010 Apr; 14(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20061172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EUD-based radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation: incorporating physical and Monte Carlo statistical dose uncertainties.
Cranmer-Sargison G; Zavgorodni S
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16177533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How extensive of a 4D dataset is needed to estimate cumulative dose distribution plan evaluation metrics in conformal lung therapy?
Rosu M; Balter JM; Chetty IJ; Kessler ML; McShan DL; Balter P; Ten Haken RK
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):233-45. PubMed ID: 17278509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uncertainties in planned dose due to the limited voxel size of the planning CT when treating lung tumors with proton therapy.
España S; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(13):3843-56. PubMed ID: 21628773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo-based lung cancer treatment planning incorporating PET-defined target volumes.
Chetty IJ; Fernando S; Kessler ML; McShan DL; Brooks C; Ten Haken RK; Kong FM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(4):65-76. PubMed ID: 16421501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of Monte Carlo statistical uncertainties on the evaluation of dose distributions in radiation treatment planning.
Kawrakow I
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(8):1549-56. PubMed ID: 15152691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the influence of setup uncertainties on treatment planning for focal liver tumors.
Balter JM; Brock KK; Lam KL; Tatro D; Dawson LA; McShan DL; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):610-4. PubMed ID: 16095848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased therapeutic ratio by 18FDG-PET CT planning in patients with clinical CT stage N2-N3M0 non-small-cell lung cancer: a modeling study.
van Der Wel A; Nijsten S; Hochstenbag M; Lamers R; Boersma L; Wanders R; Lutgens L; Zimny M; Bentzen SM; Wouters B; Lambin P; De Ruysscher D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):649-55. PubMed ID: 15708242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo evaluation of RapidArc oropharynx treatment planning strategies for sparing of midline structures.
Bush K; Zavgorodni S; Gagne I; Townson R; Ansbacher W; Beckham W
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4465-79. PubMed ID: 20668338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical Note: Monte Carlo methods to comprehensively evaluate the robustness of 4D treatments in proton therapy.
Souris K; Barragan Montero A; Janssens G; Di Perri D; Sterpin E; Lee JA
Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4676-4684. PubMed ID: 31376305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
