These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16798862)

  • 1. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; Taifour D; van 't Hof MA
    J Dent Res; 2006 Jul; 85(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 16798862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years.
    Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van 't Hof MA; Truin GJ
    Caries Res; 2002; 36(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 12459617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between restorations in the permanent dentition produced by hand and rotary instrumentation--survival after 3 years.
    Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van't Hof MA; Truin GJ; van Palenstein Helderman WH
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 12641593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years.
    Mandari GJ; Truin GJ; van't Hof MA; Frencken JE
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 11275667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years.
    Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 26(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 9870536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in high-caries Filipino children: results after 2 years.
    Monse-Schneider B; Heinrich-Weltzien R; Schug D; Sheiham A; Borutta A
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 12641594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is high-viscosity glass-ionomer-cement a successor to amalgam for treating primary molars?
    Hilgert LA; de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE
    Dent Mater; 2014 Oct; 30(10):1172-8. PubMed ID: 25132283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How effective is ART in the management of dental caries?
    Frencken JE; Holmgren CJ
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1999 Dec; 27(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 10600076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results.
    Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM; Yip HK; Smales RJ
    Int Dent J; 2004 Feb; 54(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15005472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years.
    Ibiyemi O; Bankole OO; Oke GA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 22195380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is ART really atraumatic?
    van Amerongen WE; Rahimtoola S
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1999 Dec; 27(6):431-5. PubMed ID: 10600077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ART: a minimal intervention approach to manage dental caries.
    Frencken JE; Holmgren CJ
    Dent Update; 2004 Jun; 31(5):295-8, 301. PubMed ID: 15242264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Caries preventive effect of occlusal sealant extension to ART restorations compared with non-extended amalgam restorations.
    Frencken JE; van 't Hof MA; Taifour D
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2007; 5(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17366762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: a meta-analysis.
    Frencken JE; Van 't Hof MA; Van Amerongen WE; Holmgren CJ
    J Dent Res; 2004 Feb; 83(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 14742648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.