These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16799364)
1. Administrative versus clinical data for coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards: the view from California. Parker JP; Li Z; Damberg CL; Danielsen B; Carlisle DM Med Care; 2006 Jul; 44(7):687-95. PubMed ID: 16799364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators. Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 18219238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of changing the statistical methodology on hospital and surgeon ranking: the case of the New York State cardiac surgery report card. Glance LG; Dick A; Osler TM; Li Y; Mukamel DB Med Care; 2006 Apr; 44(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 16565631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery in California, 2003 to 2005. Li Z; Yeo KK; Parker JP; Mahendra G; Young JN; Amsterdam EA Am Heart J; 2008 Dec; 156(6):1095-102. PubMed ID: 19033004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data. Weiss ES; Chang DD; Joyce DL; Nwakanma LU; Yuh DD J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Mar; 135(3):503-11, 511.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18329460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of risk-adjustment models using administrative or clinical data for outcome prediction in patients after myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery in Korea. Park HK; Yoon SJ; Ahn HS; Ahn LS; Seo HJ; Lee SI; Lee KS Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Jul; 61(7):1086-90. PubMed ID: 17537190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Canada: 1992/93 to 2000/01. Ghali WA; Quan H; Shrive FM; Hirsch GM; Can J Cardiol; 2003 Jun; 19(7):774-81. PubMed ID: 12813610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of public reporting on access to coronary artery bypass surgery: the California Outcomes Reporting Program. Li Z; Carlisle DM; Marcin JP; Castellanos LR; Romano PS; Young JN; Amsterdam EA Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Apr; 89(4):1131-8. PubMed ID: 20338320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison between administrative and clinical databases in the evaluation of cardiac surgery performance]. Rosato S; D'Errigo P; Badoni G; Fusco D; Perucci CA; Seccareccia F G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2008 Aug; 9(8):569-78. PubMed ID: 18780554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do hospitals and surgeons with higher coronary artery bypass graft surgery volumes still have lower risk-adjusted mortality rates? Hannan EL; Wu C; Ryan TJ; Bennett E; Culliford AT; Gold JP; Hartman A; Isom OW; Jones RH; McNeil B; Rose EA; Subramanian VA Circulation; 2003 Aug; 108(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 12885743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of unmeasured clinical variables on the accuracy of hospital report cards: a Monte Carlo study. Austin PC Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(5):447-66. PubMed ID: 16997924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of a newly proposed risk-predictive model of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the chinese population. Yuan X; Zheng Z; Li Y; Hu S Heart Surg Forum; 2008 Dec; 11(6):E346-51. PubMed ID: 19073531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How well do hospital mortality rates reported in the New York State CABG report card predict subsequent hospital performance? Glance LG; Dick AW; Mukamel DB; Li Y; Osler TM Med Care; 2010 May; 48(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 20351585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between an empirically derived model and the EuroSCORE system in the evaluation of hospital performance: the example of the Italian CABG Outcome Project. D'Errigo P; Seccareccia F; Rosato S; Manno V; Badoni G; Fusco D; Perucci CA; Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Mar; 33(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 18201891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Appending limited clinical data to an administrative database for assessing institutional quality outliers for AMI care: does it matter? Weller WE; Kabra G; Cozzens KS; Hannan EL Int J Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 140(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 19038463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Provider profiling and quality improvement efforts in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the effect on short-term mortality among Medicare beneficiaries. Hannan EL; Sarrazin MS; Doran DR; Rosenthal GE Med Care; 2003 Oct; 41(10):1164-72. PubMed ID: 14515112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of clinical and administrative data sources for hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards. Shahian DM; Silverstein T; Lovett AF; Wolf RE; Normand SL Circulation; 2007 Mar; 115(12):1518-27. PubMed ID: 17353447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Narrowing the gap: early and intermediate outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft procedures in California, 1997 to 2006. Carey JS; Danielsen B; Milliken J; Li Z; Stabile BE J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 138(5):1100-7. PubMed ID: 19837215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of patient risk on the hospital volume-outcome relationship in coronary artery bypass grafting. Nallamothu BK; Saint S; Hofer TP; Vijan S; Eagle KA; Bernstein SJ Arch Intern Med; 2005 Feb; 165(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 15710799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does reporting of coronary artery bypass grafting from administrative databases accurately reflect actual clinical outcomes? Mack MJ; Herbert M; Prince S; Dewey TM; Magee MJ; Edgerton JR J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1309-17. PubMed ID: 15942571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]