232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16799411)
1. [Comparison of activity expression between PET using 68Ge-68Ga line source attenuation correction and PET-CT using CT attenuation correction: impact on emission images].
Hayashi E; Iwase M; Kojima S; Nishio M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Jun; 62(6):832-9. PubMed ID: 16799411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of [18F]FDG uptake in PET.
Visvikis D; Costa DC; Croasdale I; Lonn AH; Bomanji J; Gacinovic S; Ell PJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Mar; 30(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 12634961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correction for oral contrast artifacts in CT attenuation-corrected PET images obtained by combined PET/CT.
Nehmeh SA; Erdi YE; Kalaigian H; Kolbert KS; Pan T; Yeung H; Squire O; Sinha A; Larson SM; Humm JL
J Nucl Med; 2003 Dec; 44(12):1940-4. PubMed ID: 14660720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PET/CT: comparison of quantitative tracer uptake between germanium and CT transmission attenuation-corrected images.
Nakamoto Y; Osman M; Cohade C; Marshall LT; Links JM; Kohlmyer S; Wahl RL
J Nucl Med; 2002 Sep; 43(9):1137-43. PubMed ID: 12215550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Ge-68/Ga-68-based versus CT-based attenuation correction on PET.
van Dalen JA; Visser EP; Vogel WV; Corstens FH; Oyen WJ
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):889-97. PubMed ID: 17441234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT vs 68Ge attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT system: evaluation of the effect of lowering the CT tube current.
Kamel E; Hany TF; Burger C; Treyer V; Lonn AH; von Schulthess GK; Buck A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Mar; 29(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 12002709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual energy CT for attenuation correction with PET/CT.
Xia T; Alessio AM; Kinahan PE
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):012501. PubMed ID: 24387525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of metal artefact reduction on CT-based attenuation correction for PET imaging in the vicinity of metallic hip implants: a phantom study.
Harnish R; Prevrhal S; Alavi A; Zaidi H; Lang TF
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Jul; 28(6):540-50. PubMed ID: 24710757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultra-low dose CT attenuation correction for PET/CT: analysis of sparse view data acquisition and reconstruction algorithms.
Rui X; Cheng L; Long Y; Fu L; Alessio AM; Asma E; Kinahan PE; De Man B
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(19):7437-60. PubMed ID: 26352168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attenuation correction of a flat table top for radiation therapy in hybrid PET/MR using CT- and
Witoszynskyj S; Andrzejewski P; Georg D; Hacker M; Nyholm T; Rausch I; Knäusl B
Phys Med; 2019 Sep; 65():76-83. PubMed ID: 31437602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preclinical evaluation of MR attenuation correction versus CT attenuation correction on a sequential whole-body MR/PET scanner.
Bini J; Izquierdo-Garcia D; Mateo J; Machac J; Narula J; Fuster V; Fayad ZA
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):313-22. PubMed ID: 23296082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomography-based attenuation correction in neurological positron emission tomography: evaluation of the effect of the X-ray tube voltage on quantitative analysis.
Reza Ay M; Zaidi H
Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Apr; 27(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 16531919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of errors caused by X-ray scatter and use of contrast medium when using CT-based attenuation correction in PET.
Ay MR; Zaidi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Nov; 33(11):1301-13. PubMed ID: 16622710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Accuracy of attenuation coefficient obtained by 137Cs single-transmission scanning in PET: comparison with conventional germanium line source].
Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Mizuta T; Shimizu K; Murase K; Senda M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Feb; 62(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 16520713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetry and adequacy of CT-based attenuation correction for pediatric PET: phantom study.
Fahey FH; Palmer MR; Strauss KJ; Zimmerman RE; Badawi RD; Treves ST
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 17293575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the use of nonattenuation corrected PET images for the attenuation correction of PET data.
Chang T; Diab RH; Clark JW; Mawlawi OR
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082508. PubMed ID: 23927353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cine CT for attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT.
Alessio AM; Kohlmyer S; Branch K; Chen G; Caldwell J; Kinahan P
J Nucl Med; 2007 May; 48(5):794-801. PubMed ID: 17475969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel energy mapping approach for CT-based attenuation correction in PET.
Teimourian B; Ay MR; Zafarghandi MS; Ghafarian P; Ghadiri H; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2078-89. PubMed ID: 22482629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Feasibility of diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT for attenuation correction of whole body PET images].
Matsumoto K; Nakamoto Y; Sakamoto S; Murase K; Senda M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Jul; 63(7):757-65. PubMed ID: 17917337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.
Doot RK; Scheuermann JS; Christian PE; Karp JS; Kinahan PE
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6035-46. PubMed ID: 21158315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
