These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16800843)

  • 1. Prophylactic ankle bracing reduces rearfoot motion during sudden inversion.
    Cordova ML; Dorrough JL; Kious K; Ingersoll CD; Merrick MA
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2007 Jun; 17(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 16800843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of semi-rigid support on ankle supination sprain kinematics.
    Tang YM; Wu ZH; Liao WH; Chan KM
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2010 Dec; 20(6):822-6. PubMed ID: 19765241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cryotherapy and ankle bracing effects on peroneus longus response during sudden inversion.
    Cordova ML; Bernard LW; Au KK; Demchak TJ; Stone MB; Sefton JM
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2010 Apr; 20(2):348-53. PubMed ID: 19427798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of inversion restraint provided by ankle prophylactic devices before and after exercise.
    Martin N; Harter RA
    J Athl Train; 1993; 28(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 16558248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of inversion and ankle bracing on peroneus longus Hoffmann reflex.
    Sefton JM; Hicks-Little CA; Koceja DM; Cordova ML
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2007 Oct; 17(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 17076833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is the inverted surface landing more suitable in evaluating ankle braces and ankle inversion perturbation?
    Chen Q; Wortley M; Bhaskaran D; Milner CE; Zhang S
    Clin J Sport Med; 2012 May; 22(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 22382431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of External Ankle Support on Ankle and Knee Biomechanics During the Cutting Maneuver in Basketball Players.
    Klem NR; Wild CY; Williams SA; Ng L
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):685-691. PubMed ID: 27872123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of ankle bracing on motion of the knee and the hip joint during trunk rotation tasks.
    Santos MJ; McIntire K; Foecking J; Liu W
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2004 Nov; 19(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 15475130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Passive stability characteristics of ankle braces and tape in simulated barefoot and shoe conditions.
    Eils E; Imberge S; Völker K; Rosenbaum D
    Am J Sports Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):282-7. PubMed ID: 17092922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the Sport Stirrup, Malleoloc, and Swede-O ankle orthoses for the foot-ankle kinematics of a rapid lateral movement.
    Simpson KJ; Cravens S; Higbie E; Theodorou C; DelRey P
    Int J Sports Med; 1999 Aug; 20(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 10496120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of an ankle brace with a subtalar locking system in inversion control in dynamic movements.
    Zhang S; Wortley M; Chen Q; Freedman J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2009 Dec; 39(12):875-83. PubMed ID: 20026883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peroneus longus stretch reflex amplitude increases after ankle brace application.
    Cordova ML; Ingersoll CD
    Br J Sports Med; 2003 Jun; 37(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 12782553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of prophylactic ankle supports on pronation during gait.
    Nishikawa T; Kurosaka M; Yoshiya S; Lundin TM; Grabiner MD
    Int Orthop; 2002; 26(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 12466874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protection and performance effects of ankle bracing.
    Nishikawa T; Kurosaka M; Mizuno K; Grabiner M
    Int Orthop; 2000; 24(5):285-8. PubMed ID: 11153461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of moleskin tape, linen tape, and lace-up brace on joint restriction and movement performance.
    Metcalfe RC; Schlabach GA; Looney MA; Renehan EJ
    J Athl Train; 1997 Apr; 32(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 16558443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modulation of soleus H-reflex by presynaptic spinal mechanisms during varying surface and ankle brace conditions.
    Sefton JM; Hicks-Little CA; Koceja DM; Cordova ML
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2007; 37(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17418353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of ankle support on joint range of motion before and after exercise: a meta-analysis.
    Cordova ML; Ingersoll CD; LeBlanc MJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2000 Apr; 30(4):170-7; discussion 178-82. PubMed ID: 10778794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using Ankle Bracing and Taping to Decrease Range of Motion and Velocity During Inversion Perturbation While Walking.
    Hall EA; Simon JE; Docherty CL
    J Athl Train; 2016 Apr; 51(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 27111586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term ankle brace use does not affect peroneus longus muscle latency during sudden inversion in normal subjects.
    Cordova ML; Cardona CV; Ingersoll CD; Sandrey MA
    J Athl Train; 2000 Oct; 35(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 16558653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
    Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
    Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.