835 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16802647)
1. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials.
Cenci MS; Piva E; Potrich F; Formolo E; Demarco FF; Powers JM
Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 15322639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of restorative techniques on marginal adaptation and dye penetration around Class V restorations.
Pereira Ade F; Poiate IA; Poiate E; Rodrigues FP; Turbino ML; Miranda WG
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):e17-21. PubMed ID: 22313988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
Piemjai M; Miyasaka K; Iwasaki Y; Nakabayashi N
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
Owens BM; Johnson WW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
Rodrigues Junior SA; Pin LF; Machado G; Della Bona A; Demarco FF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
