These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16803293)
1. General monogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement. Osborne TJ; Verstraete F Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Jun; 96(22):220503. PubMed ID: 16803293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strong monogamy conjecture for multiqubit entanglement: the four-qubit case. Regula B; Di Martino S; Lee S; Adesso G Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Sep; 113(11):110501. PubMed ID: 25259963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Entangled three-qubit states without concurrence and three-tangle. Lohmayer R; Osterloh A; Siewert J; Uhlmann A Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Dec; 97(26):260502. PubMed ID: 17280411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. General monogamy relation for the entanglement of formation in multiqubit systems. Bai YK; Xu YF; Wang ZD Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Sep; 113(10):100503. PubMed ID: 25238341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are general quantum correlations monogamous? Streltsov A; Adesso G; Piani M; Bruss D Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Aug; 109(5):050503. PubMed ID: 23006154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linear monogamy of entanglement in three-qubit systems. Liu F; Gao F; Wen QY Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16745. PubMed ID: 26568265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monogamy relation of multi-qubit systems for squared Tsallis-q entanglement. Yuan GM; Song W; Yang M; Li DC; Zhao JL; Cao ZL Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28719. PubMed ID: 27346605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strong monogamy of bipartite and genuine multipartite entanglement: the Gaussian case. Adesso G; Illuminati F Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Oct; 99(15):150501. PubMed ID: 17995148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating entanglement monotones with a generalization of the Wootters formula. Chen ZH; Ma ZH; Gühne O; Severini S Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Nov; 109(20):200503. PubMed ID: 23215468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unified Monogamy Relations of Multipartite Entanglement. Khan A; Ur Rehman J; Wang K; Shin H Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16419. PubMed ID: 31712571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Entanglement monogamy in three qutrit systems. Li Q; Cui J; Wang S; Long GL Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):1946. PubMed ID: 28512296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of entanglement measures and LOCC maximized quantum Fisher information of general two qubit systems. Erol V; Ozaydin F; Altintas AA Sci Rep; 2014 Jun; 4():5422. PubMed ID: 24957694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental Validation of Quantum Steering Ellipsoids and Tests of Volume Monogamy Relations. Zhang C; Cheng S; Li L; Liang QY; Liu BH; Huang YF; Li CF; Guo GC; Hall MJW; Wiseman HM; Pryde GJ Phys Rev Lett; 2019 Feb; 122(7):070402. PubMed ID: 30848627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should Entanglement Measures be Monogamous or Faithful? Lancien C; Di Martino S; Huber M; Piani M; Adesso G; Winter A Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Aug; 117(6):060501. PubMed ID: 27541447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Entanglement and Nonlocality are Inequivalent for Any Number of Parties. Augusiak R; Demianowicz M; Tura J; Acín A Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Jul; 115(3):030404. PubMed ID: 26230773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]