These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16803293)

  • 1. General monogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement.
    Osborne TJ; Verstraete F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Jun; 96(22):220503. PubMed ID: 16803293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strong monogamy conjecture for multiqubit entanglement: the four-qubit case.
    Regula B; Di Martino S; Lee S; Adesso G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Sep; 113(11):110501. PubMed ID: 25259963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Entangled three-qubit states without concurrence and three-tangle.
    Lohmayer R; Osterloh A; Siewert J; Uhlmann A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Dec; 97(26):260502. PubMed ID: 17280411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. General monogamy relation for the entanglement of formation in multiqubit systems.
    Bai YK; Xu YF; Wang ZD
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Sep; 113(10):100503. PubMed ID: 25238341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are general quantum correlations monogamous?
    Streltsov A; Adesso G; Piani M; Bruss D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Aug; 109(5):050503. PubMed ID: 23006154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linear monogamy of entanglement in three-qubit systems.
    Liu F; Gao F; Wen QY
    Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16745. PubMed ID: 26568265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monogamy relation of multi-qubit systems for squared Tsallis-q entanglement.
    Yuan GM; Song W; Yang M; Li DC; Zhao JL; Cao ZL
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28719. PubMed ID: 27346605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strong monogamy of bipartite and genuine multipartite entanglement: the Gaussian case.
    Adesso G; Illuminati F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Oct; 99(15):150501. PubMed ID: 17995148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monogamy equalities for qubit entanglement from Lorentz invariance.
    Eltschka C; Siewert J
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Apr; 114(14):140402. PubMed ID: 25910095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating entanglement monotones with a generalization of the Wootters formula.
    Chen ZH; Ma ZH; Gühne O; Severini S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Nov; 109(20):200503. PubMed ID: 23215468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unified Monogamy Relations of Multipartite Entanglement.
    Khan A; Ur Rehman J; Wang K; Shin H
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16419. PubMed ID: 31712571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Entanglement monogamy in three qutrit systems.
    Li Q; Cui J; Wang S; Long GL
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):1946. PubMed ID: 28512296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of entanglement measures and LOCC maximized quantum Fisher information of general two qubit systems.
    Erol V; Ozaydin F; Altintas AA
    Sci Rep; 2014 Jun; 4():5422. PubMed ID: 24957694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental Validation of Quantum Steering Ellipsoids and Tests of Volume Monogamy Relations.
    Zhang C; Cheng S; Li L; Liang QY; Liu BH; Huang YF; Li CF; Guo GC; Hall MJW; Wiseman HM; Pryde GJ
    Phys Rev Lett; 2019 Feb; 122(7):070402. PubMed ID: 30848627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monogamy inequality for distributed gaussian entanglement.
    Hiroshima T; Adesso G; Illuminati F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Feb; 98(5):050503. PubMed ID: 17358836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tightening Monogamy and Polygamy Inequalities of Multiqubit Entanglement.
    Farooq A; Ur Rehman J; Jeong Y; Kim JS; Shin H
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):3314. PubMed ID: 30824827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Entanglement of remote atomic qubits.
    Matsukevich DN; Chanelière T; Jenkins SD; Lan SY; Kennedy TA; Kuzmich A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Jan; 96(3):030405. PubMed ID: 16486672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should Entanglement Measures be Monogamous or Faithful?
    Lancien C; Di Martino S; Huber M; Piani M; Adesso G; Winter A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Aug; 117(6):060501. PubMed ID: 27541447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Entanglement and Nonlocality are Inequivalent for Any Number of Parties.
    Augusiak R; Demianowicz M; Tura J; Acín A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Jul; 115(3):030404. PubMed ID: 26230773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fully nonlocal, monogamous, and random genuinely multipartite quantum correlations.
    Aolita L; Gallego R; Cabello A; Acín A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Mar; 108(10):100401. PubMed ID: 22463394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.