These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16803433)
1. Killing the messenger: should scientific journals be responsible for policing scientific fraud? Marusić A; Marusić M Med J Aust; 2006 Jun; 184(12):596-7. PubMed ID: 16803433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals. Bartholomew RE J R Soc Med; 2014 Oct; 107(10):384-5. PubMed ID: 25271271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What can we learn from the Hwang and Sudbø affairs? Gerber P Med J Aust; 2006 Jun; 184(12):632-5. PubMed ID: 16803444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? Steen RG J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Research misconduct policies of high impact biomedical journals. Redman BK; Merz JF Account Res; 2006; 13(3):247-58. PubMed ID: 17124760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Research fraud--where to from here? Katelaris AG Med J Aust; 2011 Jun; 194(12):619. PubMed ID: 21692714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research integrity: Journals should be clear on misconduct. Bosch X Nature; 2013 May; 497(7447):40. PubMed ID: 23636387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ghost story: at medical journals, writers paid by industry play big role. Mathews AW Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 Dec; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 16506304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Perception of scientific fraud in the Spanish biomedical journals]. Martín-Arribas MC; Martínez-Hervás I; Rodríguez-Lozano I; Arias-Díaz J Med Clin (Barc); 2014 Dec; 143(12):554-9. PubMed ID: 25073824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accountability, audit, and reverence for the publication process. Rennie D JAMA; 1993 Jul; 270(4):495-6. PubMed ID: 8320791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative]. Werkö L Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor. Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How should journal editors respond to cases of suspected misconduct? Wager E Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(3):95-101. PubMed ID: 25711228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]