147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16803490)
21. Effectiveness and safety of loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical neoplasia in rural India.
Sankaranarayanan R; Keshkar V; Kothari A; Kane S; Fayette JM; Shastri S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Feb; 104(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 18962583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Outcome of Persistent Low-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Treated With Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.
Spinillo A; Gardella B; Iacobone AD; Dominoni M; Cesari S; Alberizzi P
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2016 Oct; 20(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 27467826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Adjuvant VACcination against HPV in surgical treatment of Cervical Intra-epithelial Neoplasia (VACCIN study) a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
van de Laar RLO; Hofhuis W; Duijnhoven RG; Polinder S; Melchers WJG; van Kemenade FJ; Bekkers RLM; Van Beekhuizen HJ
BMC Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(1):539. PubMed ID: 32517663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The use of colposcopic punch biopsy in the management of abnormal cervical cytology: a 5-year retrospective audit.
Kahramanoglu I; Demirkiran F; Turan H; Bese T; Yilmaz N; Ilvan S; Arvas M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 39(1):110-114. PubMed ID: 30230394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [The role of cytologic-colposcopic diagnostics in qualification to LEEP (loop electrical excision procedure)].
Kabzińska-Turek M; Jach R; Ludwin A; Wiecheċ M; Banaś T; Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K; Knafel A; Horbaczewska A
Przegl Lek; 2016; 73(7):472-8. PubMed ID: 29676889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure: safety and tolerability among human immunodeficiency virus-positive Kenyan women.
Woo VG; Cohen CR; Bukusi EA; Huchko MJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 118(3):554-559. PubMed ID: 21860283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a valuable method for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Fan Q; Tay SK; Shen K
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 May; 36(5):271-4. PubMed ID: 11783374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of LOOP electrosurgical excisional procedure: case series.
Kazandi M; Oztekin K; Kazandi AC; Zekioglu O
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2010; 31(5):562-3. PubMed ID: 21061801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Management of Cervical Dysplasia Using Office Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.
Ramírez SI; Lutzkanin A
Prim Care; 2021 Dec; 48(4):583-595. PubMed ID: 34752271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical cone biopsy for high-grade dysplasia.
Livasy CA; Moore DT; Van Le L
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 104(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 15291995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Analysis of recurrence and its influencing factors in patients with cervical HSIL within 24 months after LEEP].
Chen LM; Liu L; Tao X; He Y; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):534-540. PubMed ID: 31461810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure for squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: advantages and potential pitfalls.
Ferenczy A; Choukroun D; Arseneau J
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Mar; 87(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 8598950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 'See and treat' regime by LEEP conisation is a safe and time saving procedure among women with cytological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Kjellberg L; Tavelin B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(9):1140-4. PubMed ID: 17712659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validity of sampling error as a cause of noncorrelation.
Hearp ML; Locante AM; Ben-Rubin M; Dietrich R; David O
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 111(5):275-9. PubMed ID: 17665495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The treatment of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia: when could we 'see and loop'.
Fung HY; Cheung LP; Rogers MS; To KF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1997 Apr; 72(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 9134402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. HPV DNA test and Pap smear in detection of residual and recurrent disease following loop electrosurgical excision procedure of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Sarian LO; Derchain SF; Andrade LA; Tambascia J; Morais SS; Syrjänen KJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jul; 94(1):181-6. PubMed ID: 15262139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Residual and recurrent disease rates following LEEP treatment in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.
Baloglu A; Uysal D; Bezircioglu I; Bicer M; Inci A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 282(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 19940997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Frequency of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II or worse in women with a persistent low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion seen by Papanicolaou smears.
Nogara PR; Manfroni LA; Consolaro ME
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Nov; 288(5):1125-30. PubMed ID: 23644924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pathological discrepancy between colposcopic directed cervical biopsy and Loop Electrosurgical-Excision Procedures (LEEPs) in patients with biopsies proven high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Noothong S; Inthasorn P; Warnnissorn M
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 56(5):628-631. PubMed ID: 29037548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
